An English major?
Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
The transition team is being initially put together and directed by Former Rep. Bob Walker, Trump's senior adviser on space policy. The top item on Walker's agenda is to end NASA’s research into climate change and instead focus on “deep space” investigation. Trump has named a congressional staffer and former NASA official, Chris Shank, to the “landing team” overseeing transition planning for the space agency. Shank has previously advocated doing away with all climate research in the agency.
The leading candidate for NASA Administrator is Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.), a former Navy pilot who is one of Congress's leading space exploration advocates.
Do really think that the Trump administration will continue to have NASA promote climate research?
NASA has satellites. Just letting the denier morons know that. They would prefer to stay ignorant and not look. They think that ignorance is bliss.
Weekly Arctic sea ice age between 1984 and 2016
http://climate.nasa.gov/news/2510/s...s-losing-its-bulwark-against-warming-summers/
Weekly Arctic sea ice age between 1984 and 2016
http://climate.nasa.gov/news/2510/s...s-losing-its-bulwark-against-warming-summers/
What is the primary solution to climate change? I know futurecurrents enjoys yelling at people and calling them morons but what if suddenly everyone agreed that it is an issue? What is the next step? Should countries be invaded that do not comply to agreed upon carbon standards?
If everyone in the USA agrees to fight climate change and significantly cuts all possible forms of a carbon footprint will that offset nations that do not comply? The USA is not a planet unto itself.
Have you taken steps to lower your own personal carbon footprint? What is your current carbon footprint? There are many calculators online that tell you what your footprint is. Do you practice what you preach or is the furthest extent of your climate change work going on financial websites and yelling at people? I bet you drive an SUV and burn fossil fuels on your private jet.
If everyone in the USA agrees to fight climate change and significantly cuts all possible forms of a carbon footprint will that offset nations that do not comply? The USA is not a planet unto itself.
Have you taken steps to lower your own personal carbon footprint? What is your current carbon footprint? There are many calculators online that tell you what your footprint is. Do you practice what you preach or is the furthest extent of your climate change work going on financial websites and yelling at people? I bet you drive an SUV and burn fossil fuels on your private jet.
Yes. NASA has satellites which show the Antarctic land and sea ice greatly expanding.
These satellites also show the global temperature is not rising.
The concept that NASA should be involved on climate research in any role beyond collecting raw data via satellite is absurd. Their role in sponsoring a university based website pushing a climate change agenda needs to stop immediately because it completely undermines their space mission.
The Weather Channel takes down Breitbarf
So I guess to maintain a safe space for denier morons The Weather Channel has to go along with NASA.
So I guess to maintain a safe space for denier morons The Weather Channel has to go along with NASA.
In the name of thy holy one Al Gore peace be upon him how many TV Screens does The Weather Channel need? That is unnecessary to thine carbon footprint.
Fraudboy told us for years that weather has nothing to do with climate change and only morons think it does.
So he wants to prove climate change by linking a video from weather.com.
The US Geological Survey, USGS, prepared reports at one location that faked energy data for two decades, and congress demanded to see the records of how it happened and what is being done about it.
The USGS finally reported back, three months later, with a report that consisted of blank pieces of paper.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/06/f...k-documents-to-explain-lab-data-manipulation/
I wish I could comment on what I think really should be done about these people.
The USGS finally reported back, three months later, with a report that consisted of blank pieces of paper.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/06/f...k-documents-to-explain-lab-data-manipulation/
I wish I could comment on what I think really should be done about these people.
No kidding, Who would have guessed?
Which raises a dumb question. Why does the humidity data show a decrease in humidity correlated with a rise in CO2? see,
Miskolczi, Ferenc M. 2010. "THE STABLE STATIONARY VALUE OF THE EARTH'S GLOBAL AVERAGE ATMOSPHERIC PLANCK-WEIGHTED GREENHOUSE-GAS OPTICAL THICKNESS", Energy and Environment, 21, 243-262 (pdf)