Students who graduate in Environmental Science apparently don't have to take and pass basic Chemistry their freshman year.
Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
Students who graduate in Environmental Science apparently don't have to take and pass basic Chemistry their freshman year.
So that's it folks. All the deniers have is ad homs, moronic denial, misunderstood pseudo science and lies.
Speaking of.......where is our local merchant of doubt piehole? He drops a load and then takes off. Never engages when confronted with proof of his lies. Classic MOD behavior.
Last edited:
Why do you argue with the same people day in and day out? Is Soros paying you?
If you really care about Climate Change then you need to go beyond just making it a left-wing issue. Besides, the United States of America is not a Planet. If the USA and other 1st World Nations clean up their act it still does not solve the problems you speak of.
The Right-Wing folks will never be able to persuade you futurecurrents, just like you will never be able to persuade anyone on why importing Muslims to the USA is a good idea.
The fewer people who live in a 1st World Society=Less Climate Change right? Carbon footprints are greater for everyone living in the USA right? Why encourage more people to join this horrible country? It will only result in increased pollution.
My best guess is that you are strongly in favor of Trump building a wall with Mexico. You also should really want deportations as well right? More People in the United States=More Pollution. How will you enforce Climate Change rules on Iran? Why didn't Obama ask Iran to help out with this Climate Change initiatives before he just gave them Billions of Dollars?
You left-wing folks have grand ideas but not even the slightest clue on how to execute those ideas properly. Just look at Obamacare...
Oh, and how is that refugee thing working out for Merkle in Germany?
Last edited:
It's not a left or right wing issue. It's science. Do you agree?
And nobody is paying me. I do it because I have a related degree. I know the science. I communicate well. I feel it is my obligation as a citizen.
They are paying people like piezoe however. The doubt merchants. There is no question about it. Exxon - for example - profits are more than the GDP of most countries.
Yes there are financial interests in green energy but they are a small fraction of that of the FF related interests.
But I can tell that your place is as a righty. It is now how you look at things. Regardless of the science you are going to stay with your team.....your tribe. You don't like giving away your money to lazy people so you are a conservative and will not listen to ANY thing else the other side says.
You are not alone.
We need to get away from tribalism and move toward humanism.
Last edited:
If you did it because you cared you would separate facts from speculation in you statements.
The science is that there is no way your team can say man made co2 causes warming... because they can't even account for clouds in the models.
You think man made co2 is causing warming... but you don't have any science saying it is.
its all a guess.
The science is that there is no way your team can say man made co2 causes warming... because they can't even account for clouds in the models.
You think man made co2 is causing warming... but you don't have any science saying it is.
its all a guess.
Yeah, that's what you guys said about the association of tobacco smoking and lung cancer. How many cases more did you cause by your agenda driven denial? How much more destruction and deaths will be caused by those like you that now deny man made climate change?
You should be ashamed of yourself.
I understand that you are passionate on this subject, that you have a scientific background in this and that you feel like a solid citizen when you help spread the word on this. I just don't understand your approach in trying to convince people on the Right?
Why do you accept the entire package that the Left has to offer? Look at France and Germany. Look at Sweden. Bringing Muslims in is just a recipe for disaster. It is not racist or Islamophobic of me to point that out. I just don't get how someone on the left looks at Islam and their attitudes toward Gays and Women and goes "wow this is awesome, lets bring'em over!". Do you some how think they will become more "westernized" as time goes on?Data from France and Sweden suggests that will not happen.
From an Environmental perspective, increasing the population of a 1st World Nation increases the average Carbon Footprint per citizen, correct? Moving from a country that does not allow women to drive to a country that does impacts pollution, correct?
Even if every person on the Right were to suddenly agree with you, you would still not have a proper plan in place to carry out your vision. THE UNITED STATES IS NOT A PLANET!
How will you enforce climate change rules with Iran, Saudi Arabia and China?
"The senders and recipients of the leaked CRU emails constitute a cast list of the IPCC's scientific elite, including not just the "Hockey Team", such as Dr Mann himself, Dr Jones and his CRU colleague Keith Briffa, but Ben Santer, responsible for a highly controversial rewriting of key passages in the IPCC's 1995 report; Kevin Trenberth, who similarly controversially pushed the IPCC into scaremongering over hurricane activity; and Gavin Schmidt, right-hand man to Al Gore's ally Dr James Hansen, whose own GISS record of surface temperature data is second in importance only to that of the CRU itself.
…Dr Jones and his colleagues have for years been discussing the devious tactics whereby they could avoid releasing their data to outsiders under freedom of information laws.
They have come up with every possible excuse for concealing the background data on which their findings and temperature records were based.
This in itself has become a major scandal, not least Dr Jones's refusal to release the basic data from which the CRU derives its hugely influential temperature record, which culminated last summer in his startling claim that much of the data from all over the world had simply got "lost". Most incriminating of all are the emails in which scientists are advised to delete large chunks of data, which, when this is done after receipt of a freedom of information request, is a criminal offence."
A scam so obvious that any kid on the street could see it.
…Dr Jones and his colleagues have for years been discussing the devious tactics whereby they could avoid releasing their data to outsiders under freedom of information laws.
They have come up with every possible excuse for concealing the background data on which their findings and temperature records were based.
This in itself has become a major scandal, not least Dr Jones's refusal to release the basic data from which the CRU derives its hugely influential temperature record, which culminated last summer in his startling claim that much of the data from all over the world had simply got "lost". Most incriminating of all are the emails in which scientists are advised to delete large chunks of data, which, when this is done after receipt of a freedom of information request, is a criminal offence."
A scam so obvious that any kid on the street could see it.
Scientists on Friday debunked a widely circulated news media report suggesting that recent record-high global temperatures were unrelated to climate change.
The report, which first appeared in the British tabloid The Daily Mail and was summarized in Breitbart News, the right-wing opinion and news site, cited incomplete data and drew incorrect conclusions, the scientists said.
Federal and international agencies have said that 2016 will likely be the hottest year on record, eclipsing the record set last year. In its report, The Daily Mail cited a recent decline in temperatures over land since the weather phenomenon known as El Niño ended this year, and said that El Niño, and not climate change, was responsible for the record heat.
But scientists said that while the recent El Niño did contribute to the record warmth, climate change played a major role, too.
“Nobody said the record temperatures were exclusively the result of climate change,” said Mike Halpert, the deputy director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Climate Prediction Center.
Deke Arndt, the chief of the climate monitoring branch at the NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information, said that the long-term warming trend was quite clear, and that the impact of El Niño was in addition to what were already higher temperatures. “You can have both climate change and a goose from El Niño,” he said.
The report, which first appeared in the British tabloid The Daily Mail and was summarized in Breitbart News, the right-wing opinion and news site, cited incomplete data and drew incorrect conclusions, the scientists said.
Federal and international agencies have said that 2016 will likely be the hottest year on record, eclipsing the record set last year. In its report, The Daily Mail cited a recent decline in temperatures over land since the weather phenomenon known as El Niño ended this year, and said that El Niño, and not climate change, was responsible for the record heat.
But scientists said that while the recent El Niño did contribute to the record warmth, climate change played a major role, too.
“Nobody said the record temperatures were exclusively the result of climate change,” said Mike Halpert, the deputy director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Climate Prediction Center.
Deke Arndt, the chief of the climate monitoring branch at the NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information, said that the long-term warming trend was quite clear, and that the impact of El Niño was in addition to what were already higher temperatures. “You can have both climate change and a goose from El Niño,” he said.
Winter Is Coming! A cold, dismal winter that will last for 40 years. The short-term natural cycle is about to revert back to cold. 1930s-warm, 1970s-cold, 2010s-warm- 2050s-cold.
My advice to you is to get out and sell some heating units, and downscale your air conditioning business. After all, freon is a 2000 times more powerful green house gas than CO2.
