Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

[futurecurrents]

There is no evidence to support man made global warming. It's likely that changes in environment are cyclical and more long term inluding inputs such as the the Earth's precession. How arrogant that man would record temps for a hundred or so years and claim that they were able to ascertain that temps were rising due to man's hand.--Izzy

Absurd. An incredibly ignorant thing to say.

 

[futurecurrents]

that is the problem when you sell greenhouse gases for a living yet you pretend you are really against them.
you just resort to trolling when confronted by the truth.

If I were lying, why don't you link to the peer reviewed science stating man made co2 causes warming. Oh I know... there isn't any.

Yet you pretend you have science on your side.

Here you go. Knock yourself out. Please, do us all a favor.

https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8&q=scientific evidence for global warming&oq=scientific evidence for gl&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l5.20758j0j8

 

[Buy1Sell2]

If indeed the Earth is getting warmer, be thankful you are alive at this point. It is only a matter of time due to continental shifts and volcanic gasses etc that warm water will cease to circulate around the globe and the next ice age will begin. ---You do understand that the Earth goes through cycles of warm and cold regardless of whether or not folks are here or not right?

 

[jem]

don't you get tired of having to be that stupid when you are asked for science showing man made co2 is causing warming.

For instance in the first link We established through the NASA experiment that co2 has that property. It can redirect heat back down to earth or back into space. We know that.

That is not peer reviewed science showing man made co2 is causing warming.
What you presented was links to science. Not science showing man made co2 is causing warming. and certainly not peer reviewed.

but you dd link to this...

31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence". — OSS Foundation
ossfoundation.us › ... › Global Warming › Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
31000 scientists reject global warming and say "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of scientists ...

Here you go. Knock yourself out. Please, do us all a favor.

https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8&q=scientific evidence for global warming&oq=scientific evidence for gl&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l5.20758j0j8

 

[futurecurrents]

If indeed the Earth is getting warmer, be thankful you are alive at this point. It is only a matter of time due to continental shifts and volcanic gasses etc that warm water will cease to circulate around the globe and the next ice age will begin. ---You do understand that the Earth goes through cycles of warm and cold regardless of whether or not folks are here or not right?

Wow! You should tell the climate scientists that! They must not know that! Wow, you are brilliant!

 

[Ricter]

don't you get tired of having to be that stupid when you are asked for science showing man made co2 is causing warming.

For instance in the first link We established through the NASA experiment that co2 has that property. It can redirect heat back down to earth or back into space. We know that.

That is not peer reviewed science showing man made co2 is causing warming.
What you presented was links to science. Not science showing man made co2 is causing warming. and certainly not peer reviewed.

but you dd link to this...

31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence". — OSS Foundation
ossfoundation.us › ... › Global Warming › Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
31000 scientists reject global warming and say "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of scientists ...

https://www.skepticalscience.com/OISM-Petition-Project.htm

 

[futurecurrents]

don't you get tired of having to be that stupid when you are asked for science showing man made co2 is causing warming.

For instance in the first link We established through the NASA experiment that co2 has that property. It can redirect heat back down to earth or back into space. We know that.

That is not peer reviewed science showing man made co2 is causing warming.
What you presented was links to science. Not science showing man made co2 is causing warming. and certainly not peer reviewed.

but you dd link to this...

31,000 scientists say "no convincing evidence". — OSS Foundation
ossfoundation.us › ... › Global Warming › Myths vs. Facts: Global Warming
31000 scientists reject global warming and say "no convincing evidence" that humans can or will cause global warming? But polls show that of scientists ...

Some good lywering there ! New word I've coined for what shifty slimey lawyers do.

I find the psychology of people like you to be fascinating. It's the lawyer way of logic. Start with a conclusion (your client is innocent) and then construct an argument that ignores any countering facts. This is also common among the religiously deluded.

It's amazing how the human mind can use logic to illogical conclusions. Seems to be more common in the ideologically motivated and faith-based thinkers.

 

[futurecurrents]

https://www.skepticalscience.com/OISM-Petition-Project.htm

You are assuming that he is interested in facts. Only if they support -what we have to call at this point - his deranged delusions. He of course is an intellectually dishonest person.

 

[Ricter]

You are assuming that he is interested in facts. Only if they support -what we have to call at this point - his deranged delusions. He of course is an intellectually dishonest person.

Shrug. No biggee. He'll attack skepticalscience and I'll counter-attack OISM. It's all good.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

Cyclical Earth is a great place to live.