He is the scientist that proposed the Gaia hypothesis and one of the original climate alarmist. He has done a complete 180 and has realized the flaws of the global warming hypothesis. He now completely agrees with the so called climate change deniers. That is not irrelevant.
Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
That is an antiquated chart.
Before you try a character assassination of the author, the below article was written by one of your alarmist. She fully believes in global warming and thinks current CO2 levels doom the earth to 5 degrees of warming.
However, WHERE IS THE WARMING?
Evolution of global temperature over the past two million years
Nature (2016)
Received 27 January 2016 / Accepted 24 August 2016 /Published online 26 September 2016
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature19798.html
Yes, and nothing in that chart conflicts with the author's opinion that man made global warming is a big problem. Good point. Well done.
He is a nobody. Not a climate scientist and he's a flake. Like I said, irrelevant. Like everything else about climate change that you post.
You keep avoiding the question. WHat about what every climate expert and science org on earth says? Do you think that ALL the experts should be given some creedence? Do you know what creedence is?
Last edited:
That is a lie. Not ALL the experts agree with you. You define "expert" with a scientist that agrees with you. If they do not agree with you, you do know define that person as an expert.
The real definition of expert are scientist that do not agree with global warming hypothesis. Any scientist that agrees with global warming is not an expert.
We have posted tons of climate scientist that no longer agree with the global warming alarmist. Your reply is they are no longer experts.
For example, I am sure that you would have considered Lovelock an expert when he published the below book.
The Revenge of Gaia: Earth's Climate Crisis & The Fate of Humanity
Quote from the Amazon regarding book, "But according to James Lovelock, the theory’s originator, that organism is now sick. It is running a fever born of increased atmospheric greenhouse gases. Earth will adjust to these stresses, but the human race faces a severe test. It is already too late, Lovelock says, to prevent the global climate from “flipping” into an entirely new equilibrium that will threaten civilization as we know it."
However, now that he no longer believes in climate religion, you no longer consider him an expert.
Last edited:
do you know what a list of 1350 peer reviewed papers which are skeptical of global warming is?
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
could you show us a list of 10 peer reviewed papers stating man made co2 causes warming.
til then shut up with the consensus lie.
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
could you show us a list of 10 peer reviewed papers stating man made co2 causes warming.
til then shut up with the consensus lie.
You either didn't look at the chart or you are incapable of reading a simple chart.
The cartoonist, John Cook, is a nobody.
Blahahahahaha. It is a complete fraud.
The 1990 IPCC report said sea level rise rates did not accelerate during the 20th century.
The 1990 IPCC report said sea level rise rates did not accelerate during the 20th century.