Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

[futurecurrents]

Yes, now you have admitted there is no such thing. Which is effectively admitting you have no firm scientific evidence backing up your assertions that man-made CO2 causes global warming. We are making progress.

Global Warming now known as Climate Change (when they discovered there was minimal evidence that temperatures are rising) is a political movement, not a scientific reality.

So you do not understand that there is no single paper that proves evolution. Nor is there a single paper that proves that cigarettes are unhealthy. Yet both of these things are facts.

Look I know that this is difficult for a Trumper to understand, but try.

 

[futurecurrents]

1. Hansen, J.; Sato, M.; Ruedy, R. (1997). "Radiative forcing and climate response". Journal of Geophysical Research. 102: 6831.Bibcode:1997JGR...102.6831H. doi:10.1029/96JD03436.
2. Jump up^ Hansen, J. E.; Travis, L. D. (1974). "Light scattering in planetary atmospheres". Space Science Reviews. 16 (4): 527–610.Bibcode:1974SSRv...16..527H. doi:10.1007/BF00168069.
3. Jump up^ Charlson, R. J.; Schwartz, S. E.; Hales, J. M.; Cess, R. D.; Coakley Jr, J. A.; Hansen, J. E.; Hofmann, D. J. (1992). "Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols". Science. 255 (5043): 423–30.Bibcode:1992Sci...255..423C.doi:10.1126/science.255.5043.423. PMID 17842894.

Political interference at NASA[edit]
In 2007, Hansen alleged that in 2005 NASA administrators had attempted to influence his public statements about the causes of climate change.[116][117] Hansen said that NASA public relations staff were ordered to review his public statements and interviews after a December 2005 lecture at the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco. NASA responded that its policies are similar to those of any other federal agency in requiring employees to coordinate all statements with the public affairs office without exception.[118] Two years after Hansen and other agency employees described a pattern of distortion and suppression of climate science by political appointees, the agency’s inspector general confirmed that such activities had taken place, with the NASA Office of Public Affairs having "reduced, marginalized or mischaracterized climate change science made available to the general public".[119]

In June 2006, Hansen appeared on 60 Minutes stating that the George W. Bush White House had edited climate-related press releases reported by federal agencies to make global warming seem less threatening.[69] He also stated that he was unable to speak freely without the backlash of other government officials, and that he had not experienced that level of restrictions on communicating with the public during his career.[69]

 

[LacesOut]

Big surprise. A fake self entitled progressive retard is totally confused.
Analogizing evolution fact and theory with 'AGW' is completely thick.
A true nitwit Hilary supporter. .

So you do not understand that there is no single paper that proves evolution. Nor is there a single paper that proves that cigarettes are unhealthy. Yet both of these things are facts.

Look I know that this is difficult for a Trumper to understand, but try.

 

[jem]

Now you are acting like fraudcurrents.

The whole nasa article about the experiment tells you the co2 is capturing energy... some of which would make it to earth and warm it and instead directs it back into space... and you are saying that is not a cooling property. ok ... lets go with co2 also prevents warming.

How many times do I have to tell you it does not mean what you think it means?

 

[jem]

hansen got thrown out of NASA after the scientists and astronauts there had had enough of the agw lies.

Select excerpts from the letter:

• “The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.”
• “We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”
• “We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject.”

http://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-scientists-dispute-climate-change-2012-4

1. Hansen, J.; Sato, M.; Ruedy, R. (1997). "Radiative forcing and climate response". Journal of Geophysical Research. 102: 6831.Bibcode:1997JGR...102.6831H. doi:10.1029/96JD03436.
2. Jump up^ Hansen, J. E.; Travis, L. D. (1974). "Light scattering in planetary atmospheres". Space Science Reviews. 16 (4): 527–610.Bibcode:1974SSRv...16..527H. doi:10.1007/BF00168069.
3. Jump up^ Charlson, R. J.; Schwartz, S. E.; Hales, J. M.; Cess, R. D.; Coakley Jr, J. A.; Hansen, J. E.; Hofmann, D. J. (1992). "Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols". Science. 255 (5043): 423–30.Bibcode:1992Sci...255..423C.doi:10.1126/science.255.5043.423. PMID 17842894.

Political interference at NASA[edit]
In 2007, Hansen alleged that in 2005 NASA administrators had attempted to influence his public statements about the causes of climate change.[116][117] Hansen said that NASA public relations staff were ordered to review his public statements and interviews after a December 2005 lecture at the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco. NASA responded that its policies are similar to those of any other federal agency in requiring employees to coordinate all statements with the public affairs office without exception.[118] Two years after Hansen and other agency employees described a pattern of distortion and suppression of climate science by political appointees, the agency’s inspector general confirmed that such activities had taken place, with the NASA Office of Public Affairs having "reduced, marginalized or mischaracterized climate change science made available to the general public".[119]

In June 2006, Hansen appeared on 60 Minutes stating that the George W. Bush White House had edited climate-related press releases reported by federal agencies to make global warming seem less threatening.[69] He also stated that he was unable to speak freely without the backlash of other government officials, and that he had not experienced that level of restrictions on communicating with the public during his career.[69]

 

[gwb-trading]

So you do not understand that there is no single paper that proves evolution. Nor is there a single paper that proves that cigarettes are unhealthy. Yet both of these things are facts.

Look I know that this is difficult for a Trumper to understand, but try.

Unlike AGW there is clear scientific evidence of evolution. There is plenty of documented data showing cigarettes are not good for your health, there is no documented raw (un-adjusted) temperature data showing global warming outside of normal historical variations. Shall we explain the 19 year pause in temperature increases again as demonstrated by the HadCRUT data from the British Met.

 

[futurecurrents]

hansen got thrown out of NASA after the scientists and astronauts there had had enough of the agw lies.

Select excerpts from the letter:

• “The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.”
• “We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”
• “We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject.”

http://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-scientists-dispute-climate-change-2012-4

You are really deluded aren't you? Wow. Either that or you just lying.....again. I'm going with both.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hansen#Political_interference_at_NASA

Hansen retired from NASA in April 2013 after 46 years of government service, saying he planned to take a more active role in the political and legal efforts to limit greenhouse gases.[93] He also stated that he could not sue the government as one of its employees. The same month, the National Center for Science Education, an organization noted for defending the teaching of evolution in United States science classrooms, named Hansen as an advisor to support the extension of its area of concern into the teaching of climate change.[94]

 

[futurecurrents]

Unlike AGW there is clear scientific evidence of evolution. There is plenty of documented data showing cigarettes are not good for your health, there is no documented raw (un-adjusted) temperature data showing global warming outside of normal historical variations. Shall we explain the 19 year pause in temperature increases again as demonstrated by the HadCRUT data from the British Met.

I don't know. Do you need to put another irrelevant chart ? Just how much you want to lie is up to you.

 

[futurecurrents]

Unlike AGW there is clear scientific evidence of evolution. There is plenty of documented data showing cigarettes are not good for your health, there is no documented raw (un-adjusted) temperature data showing global warming outside of normal historical variations. Shall we explain the 19 year pause in temperature increases again as demonstrated by the HadCRUT data from the British Met.

Complete nonsense. The science showing man made global warming is overwhelming. That's why NO expert denies it. Not one.

But idiot Trumpers like you do.

 

[jem]

exactly... retired from NASA after the letter.

You are really deluded aren't you? Wow. Either that or you just lying.....again. I'm going with both.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hansen#Political_interference_at_NASA

Hansen retired from NASA in April 2013 after 46 years of government service, saying he planned to take a more active role in the political and legal efforts to limit greenhouse gases.[93] He also stated that he could not sue the government as one of its employees. The same month, the National Center for Science Education, an organization noted for defending the teaching of evolution in United States science classrooms, named Hansen as an advisor to support the extension of its area of concern into the teaching of climate change.[94]