Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

Arnie said:
FAIL!

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses



A new NASA study says that Antarctica is overall accumulating ice. Still, areas of the continent, like the Antarctic Peninsula photographed above, have increased their mass loss in the last decades.
Credits: NASA's Operation IceBridge

Map showing the rates of mass changes from ICESat 2003-2008 over Antarctica. Sums are for all of Antarctica: East Antarctica (EA, 2-17); interior West Antarctica (WA2, 1, 18, 19, and 23); coastal West Antarctica (WA1, 20-21); and the Antarctic Peninsula (24-27). A gigaton (Gt) corresponds to a billion metric tons, or 1.1 billion U.S. tons.
Credits: Jay Zwally/ Journal of Glaciology
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.



The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.



According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.
More...


One study and it is not the final word. Many scientists question it and other studies show the opposite.

The important thing anyhow is not Antarctic ice, it's world temps, and they are rapidly rising due to mankind's release of greenhouse gasses. Temps are now higher than they have been in 1500 years.


And none of the deniers here has yet shown that they know what a greenhouse gas is. It's like a gap in their "knowledge". lol

proxy-based_temperature_reconstruction.png


http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page3.php
 
so the oceans are warming since the last ice age.
the world is warming since the last ice age
and co2 lags temperature on the way up and down... confirmed by many papers and accepted even by nutters.

Then we have fraudcurrents trying make claims about science and he can't even get 10 real scientists (not organizations) to say man made co2 causes warming. I note when I have read the head nutters papers... he says the IPCC says...

Does fraudcurrents realize he is the one being trolled by his team. Is that why he seems to be going off the rails again.

Hey FC just produce some peer reviewed science and I will change my stance.
 
I have googled it... many different ways... and I am sure you have as well.
There are no scientists and no peer reviewed science...
which is why you never produce any science or scientists.



"list of scientists who state man made co2 causes warming"

not one scientist pops on first page or second page.

---

you have the al gore sponsored website promoting the lie of 95 of 97 of 10000 in a survey... but that survey says man's activities and it provides no names.

but no scientists.

Same results for many different similar searches.
 
Jem, gwb,

“Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.”


^This is like trying to explain to you the science of global warming. You do not even know what a greenhouse gas is. Like a pig doesn't know what a note is.

stuart2.png
 
jem said:
I have googled it... many different ways... and I am sure you have as well.
There are no scientists and no peer reviewed science...
which is why you never produce any science or scientists.



"list of scientists who state man made co2 causes warming"

not one scientist pops on first page or second page.
.
More...
Because there are so many you have to drill down into the detail, which I just did with your exact search string, onto the first link, and scrolled down to the references section. The signatures are there, as are the statements.
 
please post a link to the peer reviewed science which states man made co2 is causing warming. not that we are experiencing warming since the last ice age.
or that IPCC says something.
You won't because there is none.

since you can't do that... give us a link to 10 scientists who state man made co2 is causing warming.

Seriously. I would hope with some work you could find 10. wouldn't you. Fraucdco...says virtually every scientists agrees with him... so lets start with 10. easy right?


I don't have to click on the link you say because we already know it...that fraudulent survey is about a consensus of man causing warming... not man made co2 causing warming. As I have said many times if billions more people are not having and impact on climate through cutting down forests and planting crops and raising cows and congregating in cities... I would be very surprised at how good the earths negative feedback systems must be. That is a far cry from saying man made co2 is doing all of it or most of it.



And that was 95 out of 97 out of 10000 surveyed. Cooks followup has been destroyed by another peer reviewed paper.


Ricter said:
Because there are so many you have to drill down into the detail, which I just did with your exact search string, onto the first link, and scrolled down to the references section. The signatures are there, as are the statements.
More...
 
Last edited:
jem said:
please post a link to the peer reviewed science which states man made co2 is causing warming.
More...
google.com >
"list of scientists who state man made co2 causes warming" >
first result >
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ >
Scroll to references section >
Second paper >
Statement >
"Dear Senator:
"As you consider climate change legislation, we, as leaders of scientific
organizations, write to state the consensus scientific view.
Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is
occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the
greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver.
These conclusions are based on multiple independent lines of evidence,
and contrary assertions are inconsistent with an objective assessment of
the vast body of peer-reviewed science."
First signatory >
Alan I. Leshner, Executive Director, American Society for the Advancement of Science

And so on. It's easy, give it a try!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top