"percent of scientists is not the same as number of papers"
Amusing... this coming from the guy who regularly posts Cook's 97% piue chart regarding the number of science papers "supporting" global warming.
Both the number of papers and the number of scientists supporting global cooling from 1965 to 1979 was significantly greater than the number supporting warming.
Sadly... both camps are wrong and drive completely misguided government policy. The impact that mankind has on the global warming or cooling of the planet is minuscule. Global warming and cooling is simply natural variation which has occurred for thousands of years. Government money would be best spent on learning how to live and cope with these natural cycles of global warming and cooling.
And yet virtually all of the world's experts say that you are wrong. That is simply the truth. Not to mention that it is common sense if one looks at the evidence. Like this........oh what's the use...
I'm wondering what if anything would change your "mind". Never-mind. I truly think that most deniers, and certainly you, have a mental illness. Ignorance alone can't explain your stubborn stupidity. Like Trump you are.
We have presented you with 1350 peer reviewed papers skeptical that man made co2 causes warming.
you have not presented one that states man made co2 causes warming.
you have not even presented 10 scientists who state that.
it total bullshit to say the experts are on your side.
all you have is political organizations.
Why don't you produce the scientists and their statements.
You are such a Trumper. That means willfully ignorant and delusional liar.
You cannot find a single publishing climatologist that denies man made global warming and all of them and all the world's science organization know and say it is real.
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/?TB_iframe=true&width=337.5&height=600.3
So all you can do is post the same California Institute of Technology link over & over again dozens of times while providing no evidence of your assertions.
How many times have the moderators warned you about your continual re-postings?
It IS proof of assertions.
That is a list from NASA of all the world's science organizations in the world that agree that man is causing global warming. Which is essentialy all of them. Try reading it, you ignorant righty. And it's just link, not the page, so go fuck yourself you whiney POS hall-monitor snitch douchebag.
No full time employee of NASA has anything to do with this climate page. As noted at the bottom of the page it is maintained by graduate students at the California Institute of Technology.
You are such a Trumper. That means willfully ignorant and delusional liar.
You cannot find a single publishing climatologist that denies man made global warming and all of them and all the world's science organization know and say it is real.
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/?TB_iframe=true&width=337.5&height=600.3
we have linked to thousands of scientists that are skeptical that man made co2 is causing climate change. that is all you need to know coupled with the fact that you have not produce even 10 that state man made co2 is causing warming yet.
I think I could find 10... but when I search they all weasel out and say the IPCC says.
Note.. I think it is possible that man is causing warming.
I think it is possible that taking down forests and plowing fields could change our albedo more than our natural negative feedback systems can mitigate. I think naturally released co2 may be part of that feeback system as wel...
But, as far as man made co2 doing anything.... you have no science showing it. co2 levels trail ocean warming and cooling
You cannot find a single publishing climatologist that denies man made global warming. Because there isn't one. Nor is there a science org that does. Nor really anyone other than dumb/crazed/ignorant righties like yourself.