Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

[Ricter]

I don't even think you have produced a list of scientists who state man made co2 is causing warming. It makes it look like there is no one on your end of the spectrum.

They're falsifying the other hypothetical causes. That's the science. I suppose a "pure scientist" could agree that this time, when I let go of an apple, maybe it will rise and leave Earth's gravity instead of fall to Earth.

 

[WeToddDid2]

They're falsifying the other hypothetical causes. That's the science. I suppose a "pure scientist" could agree that this time, when I let go of an apple, maybe it will rise and leave Earth's gravity instead of fall to Earth.

They probably would if the government was handing out billions of dollars to scientist to state the above.

 

[stu]

OMG the government was probably handing out billions of dollars to every scientist in the world to say moon landings were real.

 

[futurecurrents]

They probably would if the government was handing out billions of dollars to scientist to state the above.

They also paid CO2 to have greenhouse physical properties and to go up 40% in the last 150 years and for the temps to go up and the ice to melt. Yup, that's what happened.

 

[WeToddDid2]

So, do you think a scientist can get some of the money mentioned below if they state that climate change is not caused by humans?

You don't think that money is an incentive? You don't think that money can motivate a scientist? Are they not human? Billions of dollars probably wouldn't motivate anyone.

Oh, my bad. Only climate scientist that deny AGW can be motivated by money.

http://www.gao.gov/key_issues/climate_change_funding_management/issue_summary

"Federal funding for climate change research, technology, international assistance, and adaptation has increased from $2.4 billion in 1993 to $11.6 billion in 2014, with an additional $26.1 billion for climate change programs and activities provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009."

 

[nitro]

Standard and Poor's downgraded ExxonMobil's credit rating from AAA to AA+ on Tuesday because of expectations of continuing low oil prices.

The move leaves only Microsoft and Johnson & Johnson with AAA ratings from S&P...

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/26/exxo...-credit-rating-from-sp-on-low-oil-prices.html

 

[WeToddDid2]

OMG the government was probably handing out billions of dollars to every scientist in the world to say moon landings were real.

I assume that you also believe it is total bullshit that big oil is handing out money to scientist that deny AGW.

 

[Ricter]

OMG the government was probably handing out billions of dollars to every scientist in the world to say moon landings were real.

LOL, nice.

 

[Ricter]

I assume that you also believe it is total bullshit that big oil is handing out money to scientist that deny AGW.

You fail at the internet. Proof of this practice is easy to find, from multiple sources.

 

[WeToddDid2]

You fail at the internet. Proof of this practice is easy to find, from multiple sources.

Oh, so you are saying that scientist can be motivated by money. Interesting. Is it billions of dollars? On which side of the debate is there more money available to scientist?