Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

[WeToddDid2]

Notice how they hold the science arguments on one hand when debating you, but as the logic of their thinking becomes more untenable and begins to act as an enemy to their position, the reasons for denying become closer to explanations of things unseen. So they get to use science against scientists until the corner of doubt left is a sliver of hope - then they turn to "volcanoes under the arctic". It doesn't matter that your explanation is a 2 standard deviation of being true and theirs is 50 standard deviations of being true.

That is the true beauty of science - for some reason nature does not tolerate contradictions.

But, sound like anything else you hear from right wing people? Have you seen this anywhere else in human societies - explanations by unseen forces?

Please provide the above statistical math in a spreadsheet and present it here.

You are just making shit up to back your argument.

 

[futurecurrents]

Are you implying that volcanoes are stable and produce a constant amount of heat at the surface?

You can't be that stupid.

I'm saying that it's not volcanoes. It's the rising temperatures due the increasing greenhouse effect due to man. In addition, virtually all of the experts say that. Which is why I say it.

You think it's volcanoes. That's moronic.

 

[futurecurrents]

Please provide the above statistical math in a spreadsheet and present it here.

You are just making shit up to back your argument.

And you're not even a good troll.

 

[WeToddDid2]

I'm saying that it's not volcanoes. It's the rising temperatures due the fucking increasing greenhouse effect due to man. In addition, virtually all of the experts say that. Which is why I say it.

Just what is your major malfunction?

The only way to be confident in the your "fucking increasing greenhouse effect" is causing melting is the be able to quantify how much melt is caused by AGW, geothermal activity and TSI.

 

[futurecurrents]

The only way to be confident in the your "fucking increasing greenhouse effect" is causing melting is the be able to quantify how much melt is caused by AGW, geothermal activity and TSI.

Yeah, they did that troll. It's manmade global warming.

 

[nitro]

Please provide the above statistical math in a spreadsheet and present it here.

You are just making shit up to back your argument.

If I had the time, I would do much much much more than that. I would

1. Install a cassandra and spark cluster on Amazon Web Services
2. I would download massive amounts of publicly available weather data into cassandra
3. I would implement the current weather models into spark and allow people to run their own queries which would then be served onto a website
4. Provide p-values for the results

The problem is, I don't even have time for my normal work as I already work 15 hour days. However, I follow Robbie Strickland from the weather channel

http://data-informed.com/weather-channel-manages-data-deluge-combination-platforms/

You might be able to ping him for it.

 

[fhl]

First, we have Snarkhund saying that the NOAA released raw data.

The thing is that NOAA recently released its raw data, the actual data collected from sensors not some massaged dry lab analysis. The raw data shows no increase in aggregate global temperature over the last 58 years.

Then, we have fraudboy claiming that, no, the light of day has never been seen on raw data.

Nope. Not true. A lie. Try again dumb deluded conservative. (is there any other kind?)

Then we have our resident pagan philosopher insinuating that unseen facts = some kind of delusion. And asks if we've seen it anywhere else in human society. lmao

Have you seen this anywhere else in human societies - explanations by unseen forces?

To answer, yes. Everywhere there is a liberal, there is sure to follow an assertion of scientific fact based on unseen evidence. Like for example, the NOAA raw data.

I wonder if our pagan philosopher is bright enough to follow the logic.

 

[fhl]

Their entire case is based on adjusting the data that was adjusted to begin with. It's all a black box of adjustments that us taxpayers aren't allowed to review. Because 'bible' or something. LOL

 

[fhl]

Bruce Jenner is a girl because he says he's a girl. And you betta believe it. Because people who study these things tell us so. Just like global warming. We should respect them.

 

[gwb-trading]

Troll Meter
|..!..............|

Just for you...