Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

jem said:
Try and produce the names of 10 scientists who say that man made co2 causes warming on earth... and link to info supporting their conclusion.

When I type "scientists who state man made co2 causes warming"
I don see any list of scientists who state man made co2 causes warming.

can you please show us 10 and give us there names and link to the statements.

yet when I type in... scientists who are skeptical of global warming ---

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/.../List_of_scientists_opposing_the_m...
Wikipedia
The scientific consensus and scientific opinion on climate change were summarized in the 2001 .... Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes ...... "Climate change skeptics say 'sick' science distorts facts".
‎Scientists questioning the ... - ‎Scientists arguing that global ...
Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists ... - Forbes
www.forbes.com/.../peer-reviewed-survey-finds-majority-of-scien...
Forbes
Feb 13, 2013 - (Photo credit: Wikipedia). It is becoming clear that not only do manyscientists dispute the asserted global warming crisis, but these skeptical ...
The 10 Most-Respected Global Warming Skeptics ...
www.businessinsider.com/the-ten-most-important-climat...
Business Insider
Jul 30, 2009 - The media portrays climate scientists as having delivered a final verdict on global warming. They haven't. There remain some holdouts who say ...
More...


Try and produce the names of 10 scientists who say that evolution is true on earth... and link to info supporting their conclusion. If you can't, evolution must not be true.

We'll be waiting.

Oh wait, you are a deluded religious person in addition to being a deluded political ideologue, never mind.
 
Here on ET, I have linked to scientists stating we evolved quickly once life formed.

but... just like there is no science showing a complete pathway of non life to life there is no science peer reviewed science showing man made co2 causes warming.

That is why you can't find any scientists supporting your claim. There is no peer reviewed science supporting it.
 
New study shows there is a hiatus and that the pause is real.

Blahahhaha. Michael Mann is a co-author.

http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n3/full/nclimate2938.html

"It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims."

Article about new study:

http://www.examiner.com/article/new-paper-shows-there-was-a-global-warming-hiatus-this-century

Some excerpts:

In this new paper, the authors show there is a "mismatch between what the climate models are producing and what the observations are showing," says lead author John Fyfe, a climate modeller at the Canadian Center for Climate Modelling and Analysis in Victoria, British Columbia.

Snarking aside, this new paper says that natural variability (like volcanic eruptions, solar radiance, ocean heat uptake, etc...) are important elements in evaluating our climate. As such, they should be factored in when trying to interpret the temperature record and the millions of variables that affect our climate.

Susan Solomon, a climatologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge,says that Fyfe’s research helps put "twenty-first-century trends into perspective, and clearly indicates that the rate of warming slowed down at a time when greenhouse-gas emissions were rising dramatically."
 
Last edited:
WeToddDid2 said:
New study shows there is a hiatus and that the pause is real.

Blahahhaha. Michael Mann is a co-author.

http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n3/full/nclimate2938.html

"It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims."
More...

Oh, there was a warming hiatus after all. Our bad.

"Susan Solomon, a climatologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, says that Fyfe’s framework helps to put twenty-first-century trends into perspective, and clearly indicates that the rate of warming slowed down at a time when greenhouse-gas emissions were rising dramatically."
 
WeToddDid2 said:
New study shows there is a hiatus and that the pause is real.

Blahahhaha. Michael Mann is a co-author.

http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n3/full/nclimate2938.html

"It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims."

Article about new study:

http://www.examiner.com/article/new-paper-shows-there-was-a-global-warming-hiatus-this-century

Some excerpts:

In this new paper, the authors show there is a "mismatch between what the climate models are producing and what the observations are showing," says lead author John Fyfe, a climate modeller at the Canadian Center for Climate Modelling and Analysis in Victoria, British Columbia.

Snarking aside, this new paper says that natural variability (like volcanic eruptions, solar radiance, ocean heat uptake, etc...) are important elements in evaluating our climate. As such, they should be factored in when trying to interpret the temperature record and the millions of variables that affect our climate.

Susan Solomon, a climatologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge,says that Fyfe’s research helps put "twenty-first-century trends into perspective, and clearly indicates that the rate of warming slowed down at a time when greenhouse-gas emissions were rising dramatically."
More...


From one of the authors....

Firstly, climate scientists agree that global warming has not ‘stopped’ – global surface temperatures and ocean heat content have continued to increase, sea levels are still rising, and the planet is retaining ~0.5 days of the sun’s incoming energy per year.

I think there is also broad agreement that climate scientists have probably not chosen the right words (e.g. ‘hiatus’) to describe the temporary slowdown, especially when talking to the media and the public.

However, there has very clearly been a change in the rate of global surface warming. There are clear fluctuations in the rate of global temperature change in the past. We also expect similar fluctuations in future – global temperatures will not increase smoothly or linearly.


The 1972-2001 period shows higher ratios (more warming per unit forcing) than the other periods. This period also corresponds to when the Pacific Decadal Oscillation was in its positive phase, suggesting that these variations in the Pacific have caused a large part of the difference between models and observations.


https://judithcurry.com/2016/02/24/nature-making-sense-of-the-early-2000s-warming-slowdown/
 
futurecurrents said:
From one of the authors....

Firstly, climate scientists agree that global warming has not ‘stopped’ – global surface temperatures and ocean heat content have continued to increase, sea levels are still rising, and the planet is retaining ~0.5 days of the sun’s incoming energy per year.

I think there is also broad agreement that climate scientists have probably not chosen the right words (e.g. ‘hiatus’) to describe the temporary slowdown, especially when talking to the media and the public.

However, there has very clearly been a change in the rate of global surface warming. There are clear fluctuations in the rate of global temperature change in the past. We also expect similar fluctuations in future – global temperatures will not increase smoothly or linearly.


The 1972-2001 period shows higher ratios (more warming per unit forcing) than the other periods. This period also corresponds to when the Pacific Decadal Oscillation was in its positive phase, suggesting that these variations in the Pacific have caused a large part of the difference between models and observations.


https://judithcurry.com/2016/02/24/nature-making-sense-of-the-early-2000s-warming-slowdown/
More...
"It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims."

Blahahahahahaha.
 
So where is the slowdown?

Fig.A2.gif


Fig.A.gif


http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A2.gif
 
WeToddDid2 said:
New study shows there is a hiatus and that the pause is real.

Blahahhaha. Michael Mann is a co-author.

http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n3/full/nclimate2938.html

"It has been claimed that the early-2000s global warming slowdown or hiatus, characterized by a reduced rate of global surface warming, has been overstated, lacks sound scientific basis, or is unsupported by observations. The evidence presented here contradicts these claims."

Article about new study:

http://www.examiner.com/article/new-paper-shows-there-was-a-global-warming-hiatus-this-century

Some excerpts:

In this new paper, the authors show there is a "mismatch between what the climate models are producing and what the observations are showing," says lead author John Fyfe, a climate modeller at the Canadian Center for Climate Modelling and Analysis in Victoria, British Columbia.

Snarking aside, this new paper says that natural variability (like volcanic eruptions, solar radiance, ocean heat uptake, etc...) are important elements in evaluating our climate. As such, they should be factored in when trying to interpret the temperature record and the millions of variables that affect our climate.

Susan Solomon, a climatologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge,says that Fyfe’s research helps put "twenty-first-century trends into perspective, and clearly indicates that the rate of warming slowed down at a time when greenhouse-gas emissions were rising dramatically."
More...
None of that supports that warming has stopped.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top