And yet you're not quite smart enough to even double check your incorrect claims.
So have you stopped sucking men's cocks yet? Yes? No?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
So have you stopped sucking men's cocks yet? Yes? No?
And yet you're not quite smart enough to even double check your incorrect claims.
So have you stopped sucking men's cocks yet? Yes? No?
Wow.
If you're gonna drink you need some basic rules. I'm not a big drinker... like you... but I utilize the following rules when I imbibe:
1) No posting to internet forums. lol
2) Avoid telephones and email.
3) Do not operate aircraft, cars, boats or heavy equipment.
4) Do not trade. lol
5) Do not make promises to women.
Really.
Everyone here can clearly see the massive change in your demeanor and intellectual capacity between AM and PM. At your age you aren't doing your liver any favors either. It is obvious to all.
Now had recent trends in coal fired power generation been on an IQ test, you would have fucked that one up, huh?Wow.
If you're gonna drink you need some basic rules. I'm not a big drinker... like you... but I utilize the following rule....
Lol.
Now had recent trends in coal fired power generation been on an IQ test, you would have fucked that one up, huh?
Lol.
If you're going to call someone stupid and then backpaddle when they call you out maybe you should reconsider my previous post.
You talk the talk but you don't walk the walk.
It was a conditional statement, you have to confirm the antecedent. This is Logic 101.If you're going to call someone stupid and then backpaddle when they call you out maybe you should reconsider my previous post.
You talk the talk but you don't walk the walk.
But to be fair, you might be really good mentally rotating colored pretzels!
AGW is finished. We ain't shutting the coal mines or the coal-fueled power plants and that is all there is to it.
.
Yeah, we are. Are you for real? Are you doing satire?
What!? I don't even get a copy and paste from the regurgitation parrot? Wow! You are becoming lazy you cherry pickin SOB.
Curry has no cherry. She's a dumb ugly whore.
"I am smart" + "Global warming is a hoax" = "I am really an idiot, or a conservative, same thing". lol
Try and produce the names of 10 scientists who say that man made co2 causes warming on earth... and link to info supporting their conclusion.
When I type "scientists who state man made co2 causes warming"
I don see any list of scientists who state man made co2 causes warming.
can you please show us 10 and give us there names and link to the statements.
yet when I type in... scientists who are skeptical of global warming ---
List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/.../List_of_scientists_opposing_the_m...
Wikipedia
The scientific consensus and scientific opinion on climate change were summarized in the 2001 .... Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes ...... "Climate change skeptics say 'sick' science distorts facts".
Scientists questioning the ... - Scientists arguing that global ...
Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists ... - Forbes
www.forbes.com/.../peer-reviewed-survey-finds-majority-of-scien...
Forbes
Feb 13, 2013 - (Photo credit: Wikipedia). It is becoming clear that not only do manyscientists dispute the asserted global warming crisis, but these skeptical ...
The 10 Most-Respected Global Warming Skeptics ...
www.businessinsider.com/the-ten-most-important-climat...
Business Insider
Jul 30, 2009 - The media portrays climate scientists as having delivered a final verdict on global warming. They haven't. There remain some holdouts who say ...
When I type "scientists who state man made co2 causes warming"
I don see any list of scientists who state man made co2 causes warming.
can you please show us 10 and give us there names and link to the statements.
yet when I type in... scientists who are skeptical of global warming ---
List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/.../List_of_scientists_opposing_the_m...
Wikipedia
The scientific consensus and scientific opinion on climate change were summarized in the 2001 .... Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes ...... "Climate change skeptics say 'sick' science distorts facts".
Scientists questioning the ... - Scientists arguing that global ...
Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists ... - Forbes
www.forbes.com/.../peer-reviewed-survey-finds-majority-of-scien...
Forbes
Feb 13, 2013 - (Photo credit: Wikipedia). It is becoming clear that not only do manyscientists dispute the asserted global warming crisis, but these skeptical ...
The 10 Most-Respected Global Warming Skeptics ...
www.businessinsider.com/the-ten-most-important-climat...
Business Insider
Jul 30, 2009 - The media portrays climate scientists as having delivered a final verdict on global warming. They haven't. There remain some holdouts who say ...
Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.
The scientific opinion on climate change is the overall judgment among scientists regarding whether global warming is occurring, and (if so) its causes and probable consequences. This scientific opinion is expressed in synthesis reports, by scientific bodies of national or international standing, and by surveys of opinion among climate scientists. Individual scientists, universities, and laboratories contribute to the overall scientific opinion via their peer-reviewed publications, and the areas of collective agreement and relative certainty are summarised in these respected reports and surveys.[1]
The scientific consensus is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and that it is extremely likely (meaning, of at least 95% probability or higher) that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels. In addition, it is likely that some potential further greenhouse gas warming has been offset by increased aerosols.[2][3][4][5]
National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on global warming. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summarized:
No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points. The last national or international scientific body to drop dissent was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,[13] which in 2007[14] updated its statement to its current non-committal position.[15]Some other organizations, primarily those focusing on geology, also hold non-committal positions.
The scientific opinion on climate change is the overall judgment among scientists regarding whether global warming is occurring, and (if so) its causes and probable consequences. This scientific opinion is expressed in synthesis reports, by scientific bodies of national or international standing, and by surveys of opinion among climate scientists. Individual scientists, universities, and laboratories contribute to the overall scientific opinion via their peer-reviewed publications, and the areas of collective agreement and relative certainty are summarised in these respected reports and surveys.[1]
The scientific consensus is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and that it is extremely likely (meaning, of at least 95% probability or higher) that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels. In addition, it is likely that some potential further greenhouse gas warming has been offset by increased aerosols.[2][3][4][5]
National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on global warming. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summarized:
- Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as evidenced by increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, the widespread melting of snow andice, and rising global average sea level.[6]
- Most of the global warming since the mid-20th century is very likely due to human activities.[7]
- Benefits and costs of climate change for [human] society will vary widely by location and scale.[8] Some of the effects in temperate and polar regions will be positive and others elsewhere will be negative.[8] Overall, net effects are more likely to be strongly negative with larger or more rapid warming.[8]
- The range of published evidence indicates that the net damage costs of climate change are likely to be significant and to increase over time.[9]
- The resilience of many ecosystems is likely to be exceeded this century by an unprecedented combination of climate change, associated disturbances (e.g.flooding, drought, wildfire, insects, ocean acidification) and other global change drivers (e.g. land-use change, pollution, fragmentation of natural systems, over-exploitation of resources).[10]
No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points. The last national or international scientific body to drop dissent was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,[13] which in 2007[14] updated its statement to its current non-committal position.[15]Some other organizations, primarily those focusing on geology, also hold non-committal positions.