Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
:eek:
You guys seriously need to think through your arguments before you going parroting the bullshit your leaders maximo governmentus craft.
what are the dangers of global warming? Other than more warmth and more co2 and more greening how how are we going to continue to feed 7 billion (and growing) people?
and do you have any proof we are warming outside of natural variation yet?
did you ever get back to me on finding peer reviewed science proving man made co2 is causing warming.
You can make fun politicians all you want... but don't act like you have some sort of obvious fact... that really isn't a fact.
what are the dangers of global warming? Other than more warmth and more co2 and more greening how how are we going to continue to feed 7 billion (and growing) people?
and do you have any proof we are warming outside of natural variation yet?
did you ever get back to me on finding peer reviewed science proving man made co2 is causing warming.
You can make fun politicians all you want... but don't act like you have some sort of obvious fact... that really isn't a fact.
So apparently I cannot post the single best chart that I have found that shows the obvious correlation between man's burning of fossil fuels and the resultant increase in CO2 levels and temperature.
So when piezoe and jem continue to repeat nonsense like that there is no science blah blah blah, I cannot show the single best counterargument. I cannot show the single best chart that any sane logical person would see as very strong evidence of man made global warming. That succinctly presents the facts. I have looked for similar charts that include all those factors and incredibly there does not seem to be others.
I think the reason I was given is that people complained about it, and yes, for a time I posted it too much. But since then I have used it very sparingly, and only along with added new content, which I thought would make it alright.
Trying not to be paranoid here but....
Is it to do with server load? Google hits?
I have a hard time believing that it is only because it annoys people. Hell, everyone annoys everyone here.
I would just ask baron if I could use the chart once per month or something like that.
So when piezoe and jem continue to repeat nonsense like that there is no science blah blah blah, I cannot show the single best counterargument. I cannot show the single best chart that any sane logical person would see as very strong evidence of man made global warming. That succinctly presents the facts. I have looked for similar charts that include all those factors and incredibly there does not seem to be others.
I think the reason I was given is that people complained about it, and yes, for a time I posted it too much. But since then I have used it very sparingly, and only along with added new content, which I thought would make it alright.
Trying not to be paranoid here but....
Is it to do with server load? Google hits?
I have a hard time believing that it is only because it annoys people. Hell, everyone annoys everyone here.
I would just ask baron if I could use the chart once per month or something like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Futurecurrents appears to have Mommy issues. Let's just take a look at a few (of his many) recent quotes that references sexual activity involving a mother.
What type of promiscuous mother gives birth to a retarded parrot who continually re-posts global warming alarmist nonsense?
When people bring up sex act with members of my family the gloves come off. You forgot to add that the above was only in response to others that did so.
So go fuck yourself you piece of shit. And your mom can watch.
Last edited:
That is simply not true. You actively attacked people (including myself) who never made any reference to sex acts with members of your family.
In fact the only response I made on the subject of people attacking you in regards to family stuff is this... http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index...eans-to-scientists.278465/page-7#post-3880900
Let's take a look at stoic's post showing your typical name calling responses to other users on a P&R thread.
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index...matologists-agree.278244/page-41#post-3894785
You may want to consider modifying your online behavior and being civil to others.
Last edited:
That is simply not true. You actively attacked people (including myself) who never made any reference to sex acts with members of your family.
In fact the only response I made on the subject of people attacking you in regards to family stuff is this... http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index...eans-to-scientists.278465/page-7#post-3880900
Let's take a look at stoic's post showing your typical name calling responses to other users on a P&R thread.
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index...matologists-agree.278244/page-41#post-3894785
You may want to consider modifying your online behavior and being civil to others.
I am not going to be civil to a liar. That's why I don't insult you as much as I do liehole and jerm. They are lying. You are just stupid.
Baron
ET Founder
That's correct. You can no longer post that chart.
Hopefully Max E. Pad is still free to insult people with gay incest claims. That behavior is well within our code of conduct I would think.
: )