Go away you fucking liar. You went away for a while after the last thrashing I gave you. Go away again forever now. Eat shit and die.
Last edited:
Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
Go away you fucking liar. You went away for a while after the last thrashing I gave you. Go away again forever now. Eat shit and die.
On the other hand, James Hansen correctly points out that nothing is really binding and it's just empty unenforcible promises.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Futurecurrents appears to have Mommy issues. Let's just take a look at a few (of his many) recent quotes that references sexual activity involving a mother.
What type of promiscuous mother gives birth to a retarded parrot who continually re-posts global warming alarmist nonsense?
LE BOURGET, France — As diplomats here work through the final points of a sweeping new climate change accord, experts said the ultimate measure of success of the agreement will be whether it sends a clear signal to global financial investors that they should move money away from fossil fuels and toward clean-energy sources such as wind and solar power.
Without that signal, there is little chance that emissions will be reduced enough to stave off the most catastrophic impacts of global warming.
Such a transition would fundamentally transform the energy system that has powered the global economy since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuels, including coal, oil and gas, now make up about 80 percent of the world’s energy mix. The combined stock value of the world’s coal, oil and gas companies is about $5 trillion. By comparison, stocks related to renewable energy are valued at about $300 billion, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, a research firm.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/11/w...t&contentID=WhatsNext&src=recg&pgtype=article
*****************
Hmmmmm 5 trillion dollars. By some estimates that is the ultimate cost of the Iraq/Afghanistan wars. But we can't afford to change to a low carbon energy future?
Without that signal, there is little chance that emissions will be reduced enough to stave off the most catastrophic impacts of global warming.
Such a transition would fundamentally transform the energy system that has powered the global economy since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuels, including coal, oil and gas, now make up about 80 percent of the world’s energy mix. The combined stock value of the world’s coal, oil and gas companies is about $5 trillion. By comparison, stocks related to renewable energy are valued at about $300 billion, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, a research firm.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/11/w...t&contentID=WhatsNext&src=recg&pgtype=article
*****************
Hmmmmm 5 trillion dollars. By some estimates that is the ultimate cost of the Iraq/Afghanistan wars. But we can't afford to change to a low carbon energy future?
If this is true, the world is on the edge of complete catastrophe and better take the medicine before it gets much more expensive. On the other hand, it will hopefully create new jobs while losing old ones.
What will 1.5 billion Muslims do when there is no oil revenue?
Climate Deal Requires $16.5 Trillion Investment to Cut Pollution
"The deal struck at United Nations climate talks requires an overhaul of historic proportions for energy policies worldwide and a huge investment in cleaning up the pollution now damaging the Earth’s atmosphere.
Targets outlined in the agreement on Saturday, involving 195 countries, will require $16.5 trillion of spending on renewables and efficiency through 2030, according to the International Energy Agency. To accomplish that, governments will have to offer incentives for clean energy production, scale back support for fossil fuels like oil, make emissions more costly, and reduce deforestation. The changes will touch industries from transport to construction, and encourage people to change their behavior..."
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...res-16-5-trillion-investment-to-cut-pollution
What will 1.5 billion Muslims do when there is no oil revenue?
Climate Deal Requires $16.5 Trillion Investment to Cut Pollution
"The deal struck at United Nations climate talks requires an overhaul of historic proportions for energy policies worldwide and a huge investment in cleaning up the pollution now damaging the Earth’s atmosphere.
Targets outlined in the agreement on Saturday, involving 195 countries, will require $16.5 trillion of spending on renewables and efficiency through 2030, according to the International Energy Agency. To accomplish that, governments will have to offer incentives for clean energy production, scale back support for fossil fuels like oil, make emissions more costly, and reduce deforestation. The changes will touch industries from transport to construction, and encourage people to change their behavior..."
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...res-16-5-trillion-investment-to-cut-pollution
It may result in a worthwhile cleaning up of the air we breathe, but CO2 at current levels is harmless and may even be below optimal. Even though the science is completely wrong, there may be some benefits, but probably the price will be way higher than if we had got the science right in the first place. This whole business will eventually give science a black eye. That's sad considering that most of the real experts in this area of science have actually got it right. What they are saying is that we haven't got to the point where we can accurately model climate, and we don't have any evidence that increasing atmospheric CO2 is causing warming, regardless of whether the Earth is warming or not. All our best evidence is telling us that rising CO2 is due to a combination of temperature and man's activities. But there is no observable evidence that the increase of a few molecules of CO2 per ten-thousand is having any measurable affect on our Earths temperature.
This isn't by any means the first time these things have happened. A few other examples, I'm sure there are others, would be the Lysenko affair, the Polywater nonsense, and the Eugenics movement of the early Twentieth Century. This will be another, and James Hansen will be the goat this time. At least he will be a deserving goat.
Seriously, what is wrong with you?
May be below optimal CO2 levels you say? Mankind has never lived with CO2 levels this high.
You sir, are a fucking liar.
Last edited:
So piezoe, are you ever going to address the fact that I show that you are a liar? Every time I do so there is silence from you. Come on, you have speech to text software! It should be easy for you to spew forth volumes of countering bullshit! Why do you ignore the facts that show you are a liar?
How do they pay you? By the word count? That would make sense.
How do they pay you? By the word count? That would make sense.
He has regularly provided you with the facts. While you provided nothing except the same nonsense copy & pasted several hundred times.
He is not going to respond to you calling him a liar because:
A) He is not a liar.
B) Your continual obscene attacks and name calling are not worth responding to.
So it will cost four Iraq wars. And the weapon of mass destruction really is a weapon of mass destruction this time. We just need to get Raytheon involved. Too bad for Koch Industries. Try not to cry for them.
