Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

One of the most frequent myths we hear about polar bears is that their numbers are increasing and have, in fact, more than doubled over the past thirty years. Tales about how many polar bears there used to be (with claims as low as 5,000 in the 1960s) are undocumented, but cited over and over again. Yet no one I know can come up with a legitimate source for these numbers.*

The most important point is that whatever happened in the past is really irrelevant. Polar bear habitat is disappearing due to global warming. Even the most careful on-the-ground management doesn't matter if polar bears don't have the required habitat.

http://www.polarbearsinternational....ntists-say/are-polar-bear-populations-booming


Let's fact check this nonsense with the figures on polar bears put together by the United States government.

Oh, the population of polar bears at least doubled since 1970.

Well that puts to rest this BS.

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/06/polar-bear-population/
 
Let's fact check this nonsense with the figures on polar bears put together by the United States government.

Oh, the population of polar bears at least doubled since 1970.

Well that puts to rest this BS.

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/06/polar-bear-population/
The most important point is that whatever happened in the past is really irrelevant. Polar bear habitat is disappearing due to global warming. Even the most careful on-the-ground management doesn't matter if polar bears don't have the required habitat.
 
The most important point is that whatever happened in the past is really irrelevant. Polar bear habitat is disappearing due to global warming. Even the most careful on-the-ground management doesn't matter if polar bears don't have the required habitat.

And yet polar beats are thriving better than ever during the past decade... While you post nonsense claiming their numbers did not increase.

Is there any depth that your absurd fabrications will not sink to?
 
And yet polar beats are thriving better than ever during the past decade... While you post nonsense claiming their numbers did not increase.

Is there any depth that your absurd fabrications will not sink to?


No they are not. They are losing their habitat. They are starving.
 
No they are not. They are losing their habitat. They are starving.

Do you even understand the feeding habits of polar bears. They are best fed in summer when the ice breaks up and they have easy access to food. They have a much rougher time surviving in winter when everything is iced over and access to food is a significant problem.

Their population declined in the 1970s when there was much more ice and it was colder. The primary cause of this was that the polar bears were starving to death due to the harsh, cold climate.
 
Do you even understand the feeding habits of polar bears. They are best fed in summer when the ice breaks up and they have easy access to food. They have a much rougher time surviving in winter when everything is iced over and access to food is a significant problem.

Their population declined in the 1970s when there was much more ice and it was colder. The primary cause of this was that the polar bears were starving to death due to the harsh, cold climate.


Oh. I see. So they don't need the habitat they have been adapted to. Cool.
 
Oh. I see. So they don't need the habitat they have been adapted to. Cool.

Polar bears survived (and thrived during) the Medieval Warm Period. A time which was warmer than today and it is likely a northern passage above Canada was ice free and navigable during.
 
President Obama will fly in a large jet spewing toxic CO2 for more than 14,000 miles over the next 11 days in a climate change tour that will take him from the desert West to the Gulf of Mexico to the Arctic Circle.

Obama to speak 'frankly' on 11-day climate change tour
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...-frankly-11-day-climate-change-tour/32265433/

kSRYwQs.jpg
 
Back
Top