Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents
- Thread starter nitro
- Start date
Are you out of middle school yet?
- A greenhouse gas is any gaseous compound in the atmosphere that is capable of absorbing infrared radiation, thereby trapping and holding heat in the atmosphere. By increasing the heat in the atmosphere, greenhouse gases are responsible for the greenhouse effect, which ultimately leads to global warming.Feb 10, 2015
Dipshit, you don't even know your own 'science'. CO2 has zero effect on how much heat is trapped by the atmosphere. I would venture to guess that at least 97% of climate scientists who have any understanding of thermal dynamics agree with that statement.
Enjoy 7th grade next year.
Why doesn't the Pope stick to something he knows about... like fleecing his Catholic parishioners of money each week... oh wait, that is what this is all about.
Pope Francis urges 'cultural revolution' to save planet from climate change
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/pope-f...-to-save-planet-from-climate-change-1.3118149
In a high-level, 190-page document released Thursday, Pope Francis lays out his theological argument on the imperative to curb climate change and protect the environment. He describes ongoing human damage to nature as "one small sign of the ethical, cultural and spiritual crisis of modernity."
The solution, he says, will require self-sacrifice and a "bold cultural revolution" worldwide.
(More at above url)
Pope Francis urges 'cultural revolution' to save planet from climate change
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/pope-f...-to-save-planet-from-climate-change-1.3118149
In a high-level, 190-page document released Thursday, Pope Francis lays out his theological argument on the imperative to curb climate change and protect the environment. He describes ongoing human damage to nature as "one small sign of the ethical, cultural and spiritual crisis of modernity."
The solution, he says, will require self-sacrifice and a "bold cultural revolution" worldwide.
(More at above url)
you are a troll ... they deny there is evidence to predict the ranges the IPCC has. that is my position as well.
that is denying to the degree the scientific method allows for denial. .
scientists don't typically deny the existence... they state they do not have evidence of it.
that is denying to the degree the scientific method allows for denial. .
scientists don't typically deny the existence... they state they do not have evidence of it.
So, just to clear, because it's tough to pin down a slimey ideologically deranged libertarian extremist nutjob lawyer like you, you admit that no publishing climatologist denies man made global warming. Good you are making progress. Now you just have to understand that the models are still valid and temps are well the range of predictions.
As we clearly see, there has been no pause and temps are still rapidly increasing and almost exactly within the models predictions. And the recent new highs last year not shown on this chart puts the temps even more within the center range of the models.
