Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

This is an interesting in-depth article about the impact of the Clean Power Plan on the coal mining operations across the U.S. It includes information on the number of coal fired power plants at Duke Power and AEP. As well as figures on the reduction of coal usage in electrical generation. Some extracts below...

Reality tempers optimism in coal country after court ruling
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/nation-world/national/article60223811.html

The U.S. Supreme Court has delivered a commodity that is hard to come by in coal country: hope.

Hope that by blocking a new federal rule cutting power-plant emissions, the court has turned the tide after years of regulations and declining production. Hope that the jobs that once brought good wages to people who desperately needed them will come back.

However, these hopes have been tempered by another, grimmer thought — that this development might be too little, too late. That it's false hope.

For the long-suffering communities that depend on coal, last week's Supreme Court ruling was seen as a rare victory. The justices ruled 5-4 Tuesday to freeze the Environmental Protection Agency's plan to reduce the nation's carbon-dioxide emissions 32 percent by 2030 while legal challenges against the regulations are pending.

...

U.S. Rep. Hal Rogers, whose district comprises most of coal-producing eastern Kentucky, acknowledged the Supreme Court's action may not be enough, even if the courts overturn the EPA regulations.

"Certainly the decision is favorable. But much of the damage has already been done," said Rogers, the longtime chairman of the House Appropriations Committee. "Many of these coal-fired power plants have already switched away from coal. And it would be very expensive to switch back."

...

Meanwhile, output from coal mines across the U.S. continues to drop. Production is projected to total 834 million tons this year. That would be the smallest amount mined since 1983, and a 17 percent drop from just two years ago, according to data released this week by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

American Electric Power, which has 5.4 million customers in the South and Midwest, generated 74 percent of its power using coal a decade ago. That's down to 51 percent, spokeswoman Melissa McHenry said.

"The company was based in coal country. The fuel was there," McHenry said. "Now things have changed and we're looking to diversify our fuel mix."

AEP will retire 11 coal plants by the end of 2016 in a process that started last year. The utility wanted to avoid the cost of retrofitting the aging facilities and is putting its money instead into alternatives such as electricity from natural gas and wind turbines.

Duke Energy Corp. the largest electric company in the U.S. serving 7.3 million customers across the Southeast and the Midwest, has spent $9 billion over the past decade to scrap a quarter of its coal-burning capacity and build eight new natural gas plants in North Carolina, Florida and Indiana, along with two more efficient coal plants.


...

If implemented, the federal rule would drive down mining production from the largest coal state, Wyoming, between 20 to 45 percent by 2030, according to a 2015 report by the Center for Energy Economics and Public Policy at the University of Wyoming.

"Anybody who tells you that the Clean Power Plan wasn't all that important anyway either doesn't understand the industry or is being a little disingenuous," said Jeff Holmstead a former EPA official turned coal industry lobbyist. "There still may be retirements in coming years, but it will be nothing like what would have happened."


Damn that Obama, he could have saved coal by blocking fracking.
 
Which would be less than 0.1% of the taxes collected from passengers at the London airports.
The problem is that it a closed positive feedback system. The extra carbon dioxide emissions by the equivalent of 7,100 British homes, will further increase winds which will further increase fuel costs and further increase fuel consumption which will increase the extra carbon dioxide emissions ....

It is exactly these positive feedback scenarios that scare people that study HFGW.

I wish planes are electric. Where is Tesla when you need them.
 
150,000 penguins perish after giant iceberg traps colony

"...Long-term environmental changes are projected for the Southern Ocean, which will likely affect marine predators, according to a 2015 report published the peer-reviewed journal BMC Evolutionary Biology. Environmental shifts because of climate change could also affect the breeding habitats of land creatures, finding food in a marine environment and the availability of prey for larger predators..."

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/13/world/penguins-die-giant-iceberg-irpt/index.html

So 150,000 penguins dying due to an ICEBERG is an example of GLOBAL WARMING, eh?

I guess they moved slower than I thought.
 
Interesting read...

As coal declines, miners take up coding
New startup in Kentucky aims to turn coal miners into programmers.
http://www.mnn.com/money/green-workplace/stories/coal-declines-miners-take-coding

As the coal industry continues to decline, much has been written about what can be done for coal-dependent communities. From architectural reclamation in the heart of coal country to coal mines being mined for geothermal heat, we've already seen several examples of how new and more sustainable industries can arise from the (coal) ashes. Now a startup in Pikeville, Kentucky, is adding a different alternative to the list. Bit Source is turning coal miners into Web programmers.

Here's how the company describes its mission on its website:

"A convergence of several events has brought on a new normal for coal mining regions. We have accepted that a change is necessary and we are moving forward looking to re-invent. Now there is both challenge and opportunity. Our workforce once exported coal from the region to provide for our families. Currently, an effort is underway to re-purpose our workforce. This workforce is a pool of intelligent men and women possessing proven abilities with a strong work ethic. Our adoption of technology, specifically web and software development, will bring about a new day, a new way."

A highly skilled workforce

The Lexington Herald Leader has a fascinating profile of Bit Source and the former coal miners who are working for it. In the same way that many oil geologists and other fossil fuel defectors find themselves well-placed to contribute to the new clean energy economy, the engineering skills and work ethic exhibited by many coal miners are equally applicable to the industries of the Internet age.

Still, prejudices about uneducated coal mining communities persist. What's fascinating about the Lexington Herald Leader article is how the company's co-founder, Rusty Justice, directly tackles and even subverts those prejudices — proudly proclaiming “we’ve got a lot of high-skilled hillbillies here.”

Infrastructural challenges remain

Of course, building a new high-tech industry is not without its challenges, especially in a region with some of the slowest Internet speeds in the country. But new initiatives are stepping in to fix that problem too, bringing miles and miles of high-speed fiber-optic Internet to coal country. Justice explains that Bit Source aims to put the skills in place in the community, so when fiber does arrive, it doesn't turn out to be a "bridge to nowhere."

As someone who has written about and advocated for the transition away from coal, I doubt Justice and I would see eye-to-eye regarding the issues of climate change, energy politics, et cetera. But I do believe that environmental advocates like myself have a moral responsibility to engage with and help resolve the issue of what comes next for the regions that have previously supplied the electricity we all rely on in our daily lives. But that engagement must be based on respect.

Challenging elitist stereotypes

In a separate article about Bit Source on Backchannel, Justice provides a prime example of how even environmentalists' concern for coal miners can come off as hollow and classist if it's not based on a genuine understanding of, and respect for, the communities we profess to care about. Referring to anti-coal billionaire Michael Bloomberg's comments that “you’re not going to teach a coal miner to code,” Justice credits those words with spurring him into action and setting out to prove Bloomberg wrong:

“It touched every button of every stereotype you can put on us, that we’re not smart and can’t do things and are pitiful and all that,” Justice told me. “It was like waving a red flag in front of a bull’s face.”
Whether or not you support Bloomberg's crusade against coal, it's easy to understand how such a blanket statement about what coal miners can or cannot learn would come across as both tone deaf and patronizing, especially in a community that feels besieged by economic and cultural forces beyond its control.

And it's a powerful reminder to us all: The transition to a clean energy economy will be that much more successful if we don't overlook the incredible human capital (and in real-world speak, I mean "people") previously engaged in supplying fossil fuels.
 
Back
Top