Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

So you admit to being a troll. Good, that's start. So you admit that the chart you posted has zero relevance to the subject of man made global warming.


And did you ever learn what a greenhouse gas is?

Actually he was thanking you for proving the point once again that all you can do is fling insults and never provide any scientific evidence to counter the facts in the posts from intelligent, knowledgeable people.
 
Actually he was thanking you for proving the point once again that all you can do is fling insults and never provide any scientific evidence to counter the facts in the posts from intelligent, knowledgeable people.


What facts? He throws up irrelevant shit with no comments from crap sources. I call that being a troll. And what intelligent knowledgable people are you talking about? You can't be talking about wedodudedidtwo. Or whatever his stupid name is.
 
What facts? He throws up irrelevant shit with no comments from crap sources. I call that being a troll. And what intelligent knowledgable people are you talking about? You can't be talking about wedodudedidtwo. Or whatever his stupid name is.
Blahahahahahha

So peer-reviewed papers from major scientific journals such as Nature, Earth System Dynamics, Astronomy and Asctrophysics are crap. The Danish Meteorological Institute is crap.

Got it.
 
Blahahahahahha

So peer-reviewed papers from major scientific journals such as Nature, Earth System Dynamics, Astronomy and Asctrophysics are crap. The Danish Meteorological Institute is crap.

Got it.


No, the shit you post is crap. Misleading irrelevant crap. Got it dummy?
 
No, the shit you post is crap. Misleading irrelevant crap. Got it dummy?
You are simply a regurgitating cherry picking parrot.

If a peer-reviewed paper in Nature doesn't support your religion, it is crap.

If a peer-reviewed paper in Nature supports your religion, it is great and true.

That is why I am skeptical. Congratulations. You make me skeptical of the GW religion.
 
You are simply a regurgitating cherry picking parrot.

If a peer-reviewed paper in Nature doesn't support your religion, it is crap.

If a peer-reviewed paper in Nature supports your religion, it is great and true.

That is why I am skeptical. Congratulations. You make me skeptical of the GW religion.


And yet you still don't know what a greenhouse gas is.
 
We are like a frog cooking in a slowly boiling pot. Infinitesimal changes are very hard to notice.

 
Last edited:
We are like a frog cooking in a slowly boiling pot. Infinitesimal changes are very hard to notice.



Oh we'll notice them. They will be beyond infinitesimal. They will be catastrophic. We are not noticing them too much yet, because it's early. By 2100, as that video outlines, the shit will be hitting the fan.

tempf.jpg
 
Back
Top