Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

1. your quote fraudcurrents is about human activities not man made co2. There is a massive difference.

2. your 97% number was based on 95 scientists chosen out of a survey of 10000.
Hardly any (if any) climatologists are personally on record in saying that science says man made co2 causes warming. Its the IPCC of the UN promoting that propaganda... not real scientists who have to have science to back their statements up when that make statements as individual scientists.

Here is your quote... my underline was added.

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities.
 
Last edited:
Favourite climate myths by David Evans

Below are many of the climate myths used by David Evans plus how often each myth has been used.

https://www.skepticalscience.com/David_Evans_arg.htm


David Evans
Credentials
  • Ph.D. Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • M.S. Electrical Engineering, Stanford University.
  • M.S. Statistics, Stanford University.
  • M.A. Applied Mathematics, University Of Sydney.
  • B.E. Electrical Engineering, University Of Sydney, Sydney Australia, University Medal (1983).
  • B.Sc. Applied Mathematics and Physics, University Of Sydney.
Source:[1]

According to his bio, Evans claims to be a “Rocket Scientist,” and one article describes him as a “Top Rocket Scientist.” While Evans's background does show that he has a Ph.D. in electrical engineering, there is no evidence that he was ever employed as a rocket scientist.

When DeSmogBlog contacted Evans regarding his claim of being a rocket scientist, Evans replied that “In US academic and industry parlance, 'rocket scientist' means anyone who has completed a PhD in one of the hard sciences at one of the topUS institutions.”

Evans also claims to be “building a word processor for Windows.” DeSmogBlog contacted Microsoft and they have confirmed that he does not work for them.

Background
Evans is an editor for the Australian edition of GoldNerds, a company that sells information about gold companies to investors. He also does private mathematics research. [1]

David Evans gained media attention after an article he wrote titled, “No smoking hot spot,” which was published in The Australian in June, 2008. The article claims that climate change is not caused by C02 emissions because there is no evidence of “a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics.” [2]

Evans's claim has been thoroughly debunked by Tim Lambert, a computer scientist at the University of New South Wales. [3]

From 1999 to 2006, Evans worked for the Australian Greenhouse Office designing a carbon accounting system that is used by the Australian Government to calculate its land-use carbon accounts for the Kyoto Protocol.

While Evans says in “My Life With the AGO and Other Observations” that “[he] know a heck of a lot about modeling and computers,” he states clearly that he is “not a climate modeler.”

Stance on Climate Change
“The evidence supporting the idea that CO2 emissions were the main cause of global warming reversed itself from 1995 to 2006, causing Evans to move from being a warmist to a skeptic.” [4]

Key Quotes
“If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming…” [5]

“I am the rocket scientist who wrote the carbon accounting model (FullCAM) that measures Australia's compliance with the Kyoto Protocol, in the land use change and forestry sector.” [2]

Key Deeds
March 8-10, 2009


Evans made a presentation titled “Carbon Dioxide Not Responsible for 20th Century Warming” at the Heartland Institute's2009 International Conference on Climate Change. [6]

Affiliations



    • Australian Climate Science Coalition (ACSC) — Scientific Advisor. [7]



    • Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) — “Team Member” at UN climate conference in Bali. [8]



    • The Lavoisier Group — Contributor.



    • The Ludwig von Mises Institute — Contributor.



    • The Australian Greenhouse Office — Consultant. [2]
Publications
According to his resume, Evans has not published any peer-reviewed research papers on the subject of climate change.

Evans published one paper in 1987, but it was unrelated to climate change.


**************************************

Cliffs; this guy is an unqualified fraud fishing for petro dollars and only ignorant deluded conservative wingnuts like wedidtodtoo and snoopdoggy consider his opinion valid.

whack a mole.....whack!!!
John Cook is unqualified to even comment on Evans work.
 
Well evidently Ricter is already drunk today and, of course, futurecurrents is permanently stupid but here is the administrator of NASA declaring that the primary mission of his agency is "muslim outreach":


Well evidently Ricter is already drunk today and, of course, futurecurrents is permanently stupid but here is the administrator of NASA declaring that the primary mission of his agency is "muslim outreach":


The GWS unwinds a little everyday. Nobody cares with deluded warmists say. That isn't to say you can't yammer about it its just that nobody is listening at this point.

lol



Wow you are a dumb sheep. Once again, the conservative brain can't handle more than one out of context sentence. And then you are so deranged that you summarily dismiss all of NASA's science because one guy mispoke.

This is just another case of dumb deniers finding any reason at all to ignore the vast amount of science and facts showing that they are wrong. I'll bet that you are creationist also.

And no, the science of AGW is not unwinding, it is stronger then ever, the world is starting to cooperate on it, and soon you will paying more for fossil fuels because of it.

The best thing is that more government will be needed to fix it. That'll really piss you off. lol

**************************************************
I know this is a lot of reading for a conservative but.......


"Bolden created a firestorm after telling Al Jazeera last month that President (Barack) Obama told him before he took the job that he wanted him to do three things: inspire children to learn math and science, expand international relationships and ‘perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science ... and math and engineering.’"

The post continues: "Officials from the White House and NASA on Tuesday stood by Bolden's statement that part of his mission is to improve relations with Muslim countries -- though NASA backed off the claim that such international diplomacy is Bolden's ‘foremost’ responsibility."

Again, FoxNews: "Bob Jacobs, NASA's assistant administrator for public affairs, …said that Bolden was speaking of priorities when it came to ‘outreach’ and not about NASA's primary missions of ‘science, aeronautics and space exploration.’ He said the ‘core mission’ is exploration and that it was unfortunate Bolden's comments are now being viewed through a ‘partisan prism.’"

About a week later, The Washington Post quoted White House spokesman Robert Gibbs saying Bolden wasn't expected to reach out to the Muslim world. "That was not his task," a July 12 blog on the newpaper's site quotes Gibbs saying, "and that's not the task of NASA." Gibbs also is quoted saying White House officials had since spoken to Bolden and NASA about his comments.

Also shared by Sullivan: A July 15 blog post by InformationWeek, a business technology site, stating that in June, Bolden visited Qatar and Egypt, "saying that the countries would collaborate with the United States in the future on science and technology programs, noting global education initiatives sponsored by NASA, and saying that NASA was looking to Egyptian scientists to help analyze astrophysics data. This is all part of a larger Obama administration effort, announced last June in Cairo by the president himself, to change U.S. relations with the Muslim world through outreach and cooperation," the post states.

We launched our own review, first confirming that Bolden made his statement about Obama’s expectations, according to Al Jazeera’s video post of the interview, which aired June 30.

Asked why he's in the Middle East, Bolden replies that he was there around the anniversary of President Obama's 2009 speech in Cairo vowing a new beginning in U.S. relations with the Muslim world. Bolden next lists the "three things" he says Obama charged him to do, including, "perhaps foremost," engaging much more with dominantly Muslim nations and getting "more people who can contribute to the things that we do," citing as past examples Russian and Japanese contributions to the International Space Station.

"There is much to be gained by drawing in the contributions that are possible from the Muslim nations," he says.

But the interview covers more ground. The four-time visitor to outer space defends his decision to focus NASA on international exploration of deep space plus his desire to use robots to deflect incoming asteroids away from Earth. Bolden said if an asteroid made of metal struck Earth, it could cause another Ice Age: "Instead of the extinction of the dinosaurs, it would be the extinction of human man." (Talk about a missed tweet.)

Next, we contacted NASA. Spokesman Michael Cabbage said in an e-mail: "NASA’s core mission remains one of space exploration, science and aeronautics. Administrator Bolden regrets that a statement he made during a recent interview mischaracterized that core mission. The success of NASA’s efforts is increasingly enhanced by mutual cooperation with dozens of other countries around the world that are also committed to these efforts."

Does Sullivan's Twitter post make a successful landing?

Bolden said the president encouraged him to "find a way to reach out to the Muslim world" -- a goal he described as "perhaps foremost." But it was mentioned in the same context as other goals -- inspiring kids, expanding international relationships -- suggesting Bolden was speaking not about NASA's obvious scientific purpose, but other activities. The focus on space is clear in the video of the Al Jazeera interview.

Sullivan's tweet says Bolden said NASA’s "main mission is Muslim outreach." That's akin to saying the agency is deserting outer space to concentrate on residents of the Nile Delta, which would be unbelievable. That said, Bolden acknowledged to PolitiFact that he mischaracterized the agency's main mission in the remark about Obama charging him to do three things. That is, he said something close to what Sullivan said he said — and wishes he hadn't.

from politifact
 
Last edited:
John Cook is unqualified to even comment on Evans work.


Cook is actually more qualified to talk about climate science than the whore Evans. But we don't need Cook to tell that the guy is a petrodollar seeking fraud. One of a handful that denier morons constantly drool over with zero understanding of the science involved.

Hell, conservatives don't even know what a greenhouse gas is.
 
This site was created by John Cook. I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist and web programmer by trade. I did a Physics degree at the University of Queensland and while I achieved First Class Honours and could've continued onto a PhD, I instead quit academia and became a professional scrawler. Too much doodling in lectures, I think. Nevertheless, I've pursued a keen interest in science and if anything, found my curiosity about how the world works increased once I wasn't forced to study for impending exams.

My interest in global warming began when I drew a cartoon spoof of the TV show 24 that wondered what Jack Bauer would do if Al Gore was President and global warming was the "threat du jour". I watched An Inconvenient Truth for research which I found thought provoking although I didn't know what to make of all the science.


http://web.archive.org/web/20080213042858/http://www.skepticalscience.com/page.php?p=3


 
as I have told you many times you troll, your question is a troll non sequitor.
greenhouse gases also cause cooling.
It seems to depend on how much we have and where we are in the cycle.

for instance
in addition to the NASA I have presented many times..which says co2 in the atmosphere protects us from the the warming rays... given off during solar events..

we have this...


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ear...-have-caused-an-ice-age-claim-scientists.html

Researchers at the University of Birmingham found that 630 million years ago the earth had a warm atmosphere full of carbon dioxide but was completely covered with ice.

The scientists studied limestone rocks and found evidence that large amounts of greenhouse gas coincided with a prolonged period of freezing temperatures.

Such glaciation could happen again if global warming is not curbed, the university's school of geography, earth and environmental sciences warned.

While pollution in the air is thought to trap the sun's heat in the atmosphere, causing the planet to heat up, this new research suggests it could also have the opposite effect reflecting rays back into space.

This effect would be magnified by other forms of pollution in the earth's atmosphere such as particles of sulphate pumped into the air through industrial pollution or volcanic activity and could create ice age conditions once more, the scientists said.
  • Dr Ian Fairchild, lead investigator, said: "We came up with an independent test of a theory that the earth, like a baked Alaska pudding, was once hot on the outside, surrounding a cold, icy surface.

"It happened naturally in the past, but the wrong use of technology could make it happen again."

The limestones studied were collected in Svalbard in the Arctic Ocean, which is covered in ice and snow.


Like I thought. Conservatives don't know what a greenhouse gas is or does. Amazing.

Nothing is worse than intentional ignorance.
 
Back
Top