Even Obama Slams Stein's Recounts: The Results "Accurately Reflect The Will Of The American People"

The same people who tried to tell him if he didn't tone it down the people would never nominate, then elect him.

Many of us who voted for him would prefer he act just a tad more Presidential, now that he's won the office. In that, I consider social media hyperbole something that would be beneficial to drop.
 
The Democrats’ real strategy in launching recounts
By Richard Baehr
The recount in Wisconsin, and the coming ones in Michigan and Pennsylvania will not change the outcomes in any of the states. No recount ever changes thousands of votes. I do not think that is the purpose.

The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters. If all 3 states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232. No one hits 270.

Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first time Pthis happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson.

If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it? The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote (he lost by over 2.1 million), he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/the_democrats_real_strategy_in_launching_recounts.html
Wisconsin has declined the request to count by hand but that doesn't mean they'll meet the deadline. Those states doing the counting can drag their feet in which case no delegates will be sent and that sets up the scenario you're painting. This is all about making things as difficult as possible for Trump. It's who the Clintons are. If you recall how they did everything possible to screw the Bush administration as they were leaving office. These people couldn't care less about the country. Right now they're looking for a way to screw Trump and if that means wreaking havoc for all, so be it. Small and petty people.
 
Really? Do you have proof he's been ignoring intelligence briefs? Or are you just channeling your inner Freddie Foresight?
Proof, seriously? as in evidence? You voted for Drumpf, right?

But intelligence analysts current and former have reported that Drumpf is accepting far fewer briefs, so far, than previous presidents. Now that I think of it, he does claim to know more than the generals.
:D
 
Many of us who voted for him would prefer he act just a tad more Presidential, now that he's won the office. In that, I consider social media hyperbole something that would be beneficial to drop.
Let the media go first. When and if they can ever be trusted or at least taken seriously, then he can stop with the tweets. Otherwise it becomes a little one sided.
 
Back
Top