Quote from jem:
Ok lets see you back that up.
I suggest you start a thread... is the bible a fable.
It wasn't a question. Bad start.
Quote from jem:
You pick the inconsistency and I will provide the response.
In fact I show literal inconsistency or contradiction, you deny everything and anything, turn everything and anything into absurdity, interpret everything and anything off the charts and commence the name calling and possibly use your sockpuppet again.
No thanks. You've already proved yourself too dumb to make anything that resembles a coherent rational argument.
Quote from jem:
We already know we have covered some of this on et... some may be tougher to come to a consensus than others - granted. I am fine with that. I only force the issue when you make ridiculous claims like the one in which you said there is plenty of science showing life evolved from non life here on earth.
You think 'forcing the issue' is to adopt some or all those methods you use which I mentioned above, changing wording, to say something that wasn't said.
Exactly my point to Wallet.
Alter bible words so they don't say what they do say.
Alter my words likewise.
Quote from jem:
I will also show some other things which would make this "fable" pretty amazing.
Lets tackle this one issue at a time a do a good job.
In the end it should be clear one of us is the fool.
You already claimed the fool title for yourself a long time ago.
Quote from jem:
If you agree to stick to the point and actually link to evidence instead of your own baloney... I will agree to refrain from name calling you names provided you exercise the same restraint and refrain from misrepresenting my statements.
So let me get this straight.
I make a statement, you misunderstand it , misrepresent it, change its wording and context. You then accuse me of misrepresenting your statements, ask for confirmation of what I said from a link rather than discuss its reason and logic, get a link, then say the information in the link is bullshit, call it baloney and go back to name calling, possibly using your sockpuppet again, but accuse everyone else of using a sockpuppet, and when you're caught, tell me to fuck off.
Got it.
You and your religious cronies who subscribe to all that sort of sheer indefensible bunkum, obviously consider absurdity is an acceptable argument and can never be wrong, as if that has a special pass in the name of religion. Whereas in reality, evidence fact and reason aren't allowed a place in the Weird World of God.