Quote from cabletrader:
It's unlikely many would have been positioned long Eur/Usd on the off-chance of some unexpected Fannie and Freddie news. He was. He made profit from the spike up.
Quote from KS96:
It's also unlikely he would have closed on the spike.
I rest my case here. Your logic is flawed, and you don't even want to see why. Good luck with "hedging".
Quote from cabletrader:
Wrong. It's unlikely many would have been positioned long Eur/Usd on the off-chance of some unexpected Fannie and Freddie news. He was. He made profit from the spike up. That was obviously an advantage.
Quote from KS96:
He was NET NEUTRAL for god's shake!!!!
And maybe he got short, if he had the nerve, on the spike up. NO ADVANTAGE, get your act straight.

Quote from cabletrader:
It's not a case of 'maybe he got short' he was short, he was originally long and short, you said it yourself he was net neutral! Both the long and short positions made money, that was the advantage!
Quote from KS96:
Scalpz, good to have you back mate (if you ever left)![]()
Priceless entertainment.