The confirming sgnals from DX, UsdChf and UsdSek, all analyzed with the same technique, therefore had a ripple effect in that the technique has a flaw (Duh!!) - I'm correcting this now and there are no guaranties that some other flaw will not show up.
I'm trying to NOT make the usual mistake that learners make in that when one flaw is corrected, some other unanticipated flaw shows up ad infinitum - I'm dispensing with this liability by each time starting from the root.
But what if the root is flawed too?!!!
And let's not go to the ultimate root = traders cannot ever win overall - fck that, I always finish what I started even if this time I have to end up my namesake.
The confirming signal idea is a good one, so this concept will be retained, but MY FLAWED REALTIME METHOD will be taken apart over time - this has been ongoing since Oct 2009 when I came to ET. No conclusive result yet. If there is one you'll know it here and once its confirmed and rolling, I'll be gone, never to return to my High School Trader Days.
