Quote from FXSnipe:
cabletrader, Im not n Eliiot wave person although I spent a lot of time studying Elliot's work and read a lot fo stuff by Robert Prechter, some by Robert Miner but funny enough I couldn't make me a dime with it after all the work I put in, gosh I can even write a book on that stuff. Miner's stuff is quite good though.
When I look a chart now I don't want to label waves as I really do not know where the market is going, welll yes I can sort of see where the "waves" are but it really doesn't influence me in any way as the makrtket neither knows whether its the 5thof the 3rd wave nor 1st of the 5th and it just doesn't care.
Quote from pentothal:
Hi all,
I suppose it all comes down to "what works for you".
I always viewed history as cyclical, probably started when we studied Gian Battista Vico (Italian philosopher of the 17th century) at school. So I found easy to understand and "agree" on the basic principles of the Elliott Wave theory.
Having said that I am just at the beginning of my trading experience using waves and I found that is easier (realtive to equities) to spot cycles in currencies, which move relatively slowly and with ample movements.
I would be ready to abandon that if I found out that is not what works for me going forward, but at the moment I am giving it a try with some relative success.
Quote from cabletrader:
Up to a point, but there are limits!![]()
Quote from FXSnipe:
cabletrader, where and how do you determine those limits? Are you talking about limits in terms of monetary loss or something else? What works for me in my definition is when I take learnings from different sources and adapt it to my own according to the way I view the market.