Quote from Zen Student:
Out 69 even -3 ticks...European markets close. Back in 67 stop 66.
Quote from logic_man:
Cycles are too inexact, due to the existence of standard deviations within them. I only deal with precise measures. The trade was barely viable under my model and losses are part of the game. None of what you wrote matters to me. Cycles, European market, gaps, etc. are all accounted for by other means in my model, which encompasses all trading, not just RTH, so your "questions" have already been asked and answered. The fact that the answers, in this case, led to a 2.25 point loss is just part of the reality of dealing with probabilities.
Quote from Zr1Trader:
Zenmaster, thank you for your warning not to short the last couple days
Finally I see you admit you are wrong for once and don't know "every move in advance" . That was funny while it lasted though.
Quote from Zr1Trader:
Zen,
All i know is that it looks a little fishy that you try to help all these people with very intruiging long posts of how you know the unknown.
If you are truly a proficient player, why bother with the riddles and nonsense if your goal is to help "save" these people?
It just seems like snakeoil.
Quote from Zen Student:
How can you possibly learn to read it without understanding what creates price action and how prices are caused to move?
Simple answer for newbies who wish to evaluate claims that price action can be read without any such understanding: ask to see the trading results of those who claim they can trade the market successfully without understanding how it works.
Price action does indeed give objective data about what actually happened. The aspiring trader needs to understand what is likely to happen in the future in order to place profitable trades.

