Quote from spindr0:
1) I do not think much of a vertical spread that takes in less premium than the intrinsic value of the position. IOW, you sell a July 5/3 put spread that takes in $1.20 and will buy the stock for $3.80 if assigned. The current stock price is $3.55. What a deal!
You are missing the point, assignment is a risk not something i WANT to buy. Chance of a july non-dividend stock early assignment is not high.
I would use $1.2 credit to buy the stock at $3.5. As for the stock price going down from 3.8 to 3.5 on friday, that's not relevant for the discussion.
As for it being wallpaper, that's your opinion on the outlook of etfc (looks like you do have an opinion on the outlook after all), maybe right or wrong, not the point. Go argue about that on yahoo finance instead. The downside risk IS limited... to $190, with great upside potential (my view).Quote from spindr0:
2) I would not consider a 1 unit position (1 spread and 30 shares) with $190 of downside risk on a $3.55 stock to be one of limited downside risk, particularly since this isn't far from being wallpaper.
Quote from spindr0:
3) Selling month over month covered calls on the underlying isn't going to do much to reduce your cost basis. What are you going to get for a $5 strike, 5 cents per month? (you suggested a bounce back to $5)
Feb 5 is .15-.2, 4 is .35-.45, considering underlying at 3.5 i say that's not bad.
Quote from spindr0:
4) If you insist on doing this position, sell naked puts instead of buying the stock and writing covered calls against it. Since they're synthetically equivalent, why bother with the extra slippage and commissions?
I dont think that's writing a COVERED call, where is the cover? Isnt that just a short strangle? you are betting a highly volatile sub $5 stock will stay within a trading range of 3(short put) - 5( short call), and in the process add an unlimited risk to your position. (what if amtrade buys etfc and it jumps to $10?).
