Quote from Cache Landing:
You can always get some education, pass the 65, and get a job with an established IA. Chances are you will start out in account development or something. Essentially marketing the firms services to prospective clients. You have to pass the 65 if you want to do anything besides file papers for the IA. Once you have proven yourself, you will become a portfolio manager. This is a good way to learn the ins-n-outs of the IA business (which is essentially what you seem to be trying to do) while at the same time getting the word out there that you are someone that can be taken seriously. That is, if you are really as good as you are implying you are.
Problem with working for another firm is that you have to pay your dues, which might require you to adopt someone else's trading (investment) strategy for a while. During this time you won't really be making much money. You will also have to learn how not to shove your personal strategy onto every client that walks through the door. Recommending the same strategy to every client is a no-no. To be a good IA (IAR) you need to be versatile and knowledgeable. In this case, in order to be competetive, you should charge in the neighborhood of 1% of assets under management. You won't be able to pay the bills until you get at least 4-5MM under management.
I have my 65, CFA Level II, and an MBA in Finance. I have thought about taking this route... I am assuming you are referring to independent investment advisory firms. My issue with this is you are more of a salesman, than a money manager. You are paid to hold the clients hand, not manage money. You have to sacrifice your investment strategy to sell whatever the client is most likely to buy into. That said, I may be forced to take this route if there aren't any other viable options.
I did see this link on Green Trader on incubator hedge funds.
http://www.greencompany.com/HedgeFunds/HedgeFundIncubatorFunds.shtml
I do plan on eating my own cooking and putting a significant portion of my net worth on the line. Trouble is 100K IS a significant portion of my net worth, I am not Barton Biggs.