omniscient
Guest
yes. i was paying almost $300/mo with esignal. now i pay $10/mo for IB data and $60/yr for QT. i understand that some of those monthly fees were exchange fees, but i wasn't paying $300 worth of exchange fees.Quote from iqfeed:
I am curious, What are the keys that would make you think something is better than Esignal? Obviously, everyone's needs are different, and I would love to learn what the keys are for you (or others on the forum).
A better price?
sort of. the majority of the time, my e$ignal kept up with my broker feed. fed days were often a no-show, but overall pretty reliable. no service or data feed will ever offer 100% reliability or availability.a more reliable feed?
uhm, better as in more useful not necessarily more stuff. though, personally, i much prefer being able to us MP charts with studies applied to the charts - that way i don't have to keep up multiple charts of a particular market.A better analytics package?
not interested.Better news?
yes. i appreciate the e$ignal rep making efforts here, but when working with e$ignal directly it was less than memorable. Jerry and the guys at QT are unreal - damn near instant feedback 24/7. the guys at linnsoft are pretty amazing too. and i think you can get IRT from linnsoft for about $50/mo with an IB feed and historical backfill.Better customer support?
yes. QT and IRT as constantly adding/tweaking/testing/etc features and functionality. e$ignal may have a bigger market so it seems less practical for them to continually release new upgrades, but, like QT and IRT, you wouldn't have to upgrade if you didn't want to.More frequent upgrades?
no i think that about does it: usability, price, availability, enhancements, and customer service.other things?
hth
take care

omni
