EFS is a disaster. Do you plan on revising it so it's not as clunky as it used to be? Getting work done in EFS was a total chore compared to TS or NT.
Quote from garchbrooks:
EFS is a disaster. Do you plan on revising it so it's not as clunky as it used to be? Getting work done in EFS was a total chore compared to TS or NT.
Quote from garchbrooks:
EFS is a disaster. Do you plan on revising it so it's not as clunky as it used to be? Getting work done in EFS was a total chore compared to TS or NT.
+1 !Quote from sculptor66:
Actually, EFS is quite elegant, because it follows the ECMA script standard syntax (like, for example, Javascript, Java or C++). In fact, EFS is just kind of an extended version of Javascript. Much better than EasyLanguage of Tradestation.
It's NOT clunky, if you are used to this syntax (which most people with programming experience are).
The worst thing would be if EFS would be abandoned for a replacement which does not follow any standards (like EasyLanguage).
Quote from sculptor66:
...The worst thing would be if EFS would be abandoned for a replacement which does not follow any standards (like EasyLanguage).