E ESfocus Jan 15, 2019 #172 What just happened? Oh, ya we broke 2600, finally. The curse of the 2600 is off
E ESfocus Jan 15, 2019 #173 vanzandt said: ? More... 2565 was the lower end of the range they were defending. My range ie, their range (at that time) as close as I could tell was 2580-2565
vanzandt said: ? More... 2565 was the lower end of the range they were defending. My range ie, their range (at that time) as close as I could tell was 2580-2565
E ESfocus Jan 15, 2019 #174 I'm not getting short now. They just broke 2600, let's see what they want to do with it. They'll leave clues ...eventually
I'm not getting short now. They just broke 2600, let's see what they want to do with it. They'll leave clues ...eventually
E ESfocus Jan 15, 2019 #176 They busted out one level 2600, LOOK at the Nas, and now they are on steroids This may trigger short squeeze?
They busted out one level 2600, LOOK at the Nas, and now they are on steroids This may trigger short squeeze?
E ESfocus Jan 15, 2019 #177 Steven J. Gould's theory of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium applies to markets, imo. (in concept only) periods of stasis followed by explosive growth. (Are those market charts to the right ) Last edited: Jan 15, 2019
Steven J. Gould's theory of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium applies to markets, imo. (in concept only) periods of stasis followed by explosive growth. (Are those market charts to the right )
E ESfocus Jan 15, 2019 #178 We now know what direction, next Q, how far? NQ is 130 LOL Has it ever been +150??