In contrast to SPX options:Quote from FullyArticulate:
ES margins have *dramatically* better margin treatment than SPX (particularly if you're short an option).
ES is American style, SPX is not.
ES needs a slightly different option pricing model (Black instead of Black-Scholes) due to the fact futures decay in value from the cost of carry.
ES settles into a futures contract (on serials), SPX always settles into cash.
ES does not have weekly options, SPX does.
I prefer futures options to equity/index options.
I'm pretty sure this is a rule violation.Quote from omcate:
Retail traders can submit BUY and SELL orders of the same ES options to CME at the same time (act as market maker).
Quote from FullyArticulate:
I'm pretty sure this is a rule violation.
http://rulebook.cme.com/Rulebook/Chapters/pdffiles/005.pdf
CME Rule #534:
No person shall accept from, or place for, the same beneficial owner simultaneous buy and sell orders for the same product and expiration month, and, for a put or call option, the same strike price. Violation of this rule shall be a major offense.
Market Makers have a different set of rules. This one isn't quite on point, but you can see how market makers have rules superseded and redefined:Quote from omcate:
If the above rule is true, even market-makers cannot quote the bid-ask prices.
I tried something like that few times in the past, and CME DID accept both orders.
It's not specific to options, but margin requirements are on the home page, under Quick Links: "Performance Bond Requirements".Quote from thegazelle:
Can anyone post a link to margin specs on ES options? I can't find info regarding margins on the CME site.
It's possible there's different tax treatment in the US.Quote from yip1997:
So the only benefit is lower margin requirement, right?