you are also scaling in and adding removing portions of the position,point i was making is that all those that don;t avg should not avg,nor should they advise/critique in same area...personally,my timing sucks,if i were a scalper,it would be death by a thousand cuts,so should i give up or adapt,just another of a 1000 ways to tradeQuote from Laissez Faire:
I am glad I don`t know how to average, because if I knew, I would have to unlearn that habit. If one can`t figure out the right entries, then one always have the choice to not enter in the first place.
Averaging a loser, i.e., selling a rising market or buying a falling market is ultimately a losing strategy. If not today, then tomorrow. Even if you are the house and can add to infinity against a strong directional movement, your small winner is still a loser compared to what could have been earned by being on the right side of the market, i.e., opportunity cost.
A thousand stops is obviously an exaggeration, but when entering around a reversal zone, one will not take that many stop outs and truth be told, a few stop outs on minimum size is not that painful, compared to getting stopped out at the turning point on maximum leverage. If the move have a good R/R to start with, one will quickly make back the losses and then some when one finally catches the move. There are different ways to work a turning point. One way would be to trail an order above/below the market.
I assume the correct way to average is within a tight predefined zone planned in advance and then taking the stop no matter what. It is still a flawed strategy, because one is setting oneself up to lose with maximum size and win with minimum size as the average averager usually scales out of his winners.
I wonder how high the win percentage needs to be in order to have positive expectancy with such a strategy? Cut your losses and ride your winners, not the other way around.
Good trading all.![]()
