ES Journal Archive (2011)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from Laissez Faire:

Stopped out while eating dinner. Did I make 0,5 points on the trade or did I lose 6,0 points?

I think maybe I`m too late to short this, unless I get a clean entry.

NQ looks a little stronger though, currently trading above it `s 50% level.

Your mouth runs a lot more than your profits :D
 
Quote from A-No1:

Your mouth runs a lot more than your profits :D

Sorry. It`s a bad habit :)

I`m a little concerned about emg`s order down there, but I`m seeing a potential long entry setting up. Maybe.
 
Quote from Laissez Faire:

Stopped out while eating dinner. Did I make 0,5 points on the trade or did I lose 6,0 points?

I think maybe I`m too late to short this, unless I get a clean entry.

NQ looks a little stronger though, currently trading above it `s 50% level.

LF,

1) You made 0.5 points <b>with</b> a 6.5 MFE and a 2.0 MAE
2) You're never late or early - that's only hindsight

More important:
1) Did you go long because you saw a long or because you had been stopped out of some good shorts?
2) Did you widen your stop (triple the size you were using so far) because of your analysis or to avoid the pain of being stopped out one more time?

For what it's worth, I think that you played it well (while I sadly sat on my hands - so I take off my hat to you, Sir).

Next.
 
Quote from Picaso:

1) You made 0.5 points <b>with</b> a 6.5 MFE and a 2.0 MAE

Is that good or bad? I`m satisfied that I managed risk and did not let it turn into a loss, although I left profits on the table.

If we did go straight to 1200, I would look like a genius, so hindsight is always 20/20 :)

Quote from Picaso:

2) You're never late or early - that's only hindsight

Let me clarify. If I believe that a move is already overextended, I am by definition too late to enter in that direction.

I went long because I believed the market had formed a bottom and we were due for upside movement. Prior trades did not influence me.

I widened my stop because I believed that it was technically too tight and it was still within my risk parameters :)

Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top