ES Journal Archive (2009 - 2010)
- Thread starter Jahajee
- Start date
- Status
I believe your approach to conveying your message in a piecemeal fashion is more "stealthy" than the actual content you present. Frankly, most of it doesn't make sense to me and I've been trading for 20 years. Perhaps this is the reason why you get so much flack from others. Why don't you just come out straight and tell it like it is.
Quote from schizo:
So what's the target for tomorrow? Throw in the high and the low and we'll see who gets the idiot savant award for tomorrow.
High: 1112
Low: 1089
1117.25...Barring any ridiculous rumors (News)
Flack is fine. I am good trader. Thats not dependent on anyone's opinion of things they have no clue about and I understand that. I have chosen to spend some time in here like everyone else. Thus, I accept other people views no matter how limited their scope of me is.
The way I trade seems to very different than the forum participants. Or possible just parts. So I will stack information over time publicly as I see appropriate.
As always, if anyone is truly interested to learn how I trade they will PM me. I am not in here to amuse anyone with detailed information to fall on deaf ears. Those that want to learn are already learning.
So if, being a 20 year vet, you want to PM me and see how I trade the QM [sooner than later] I am available. It's super reliable signal that isn't an everyday occurrence and if you trade Oil futures, I am sure it will be a nice addition to your trading acumen.
Ok, as a guide this is now a valid short set-up with todays low of 1055.50 as the minimum downside target.
Confirmation of this: when looking at the current ES 16:30pm est 30m bar, price needs to rise (as of now) to a minimum of 1103.50 to initiate this downside target...each 30m bar from this bar that passes, the upside target that needs breeched increases by 1 tick. So the ES 17:00 pm est upside will be 1103.75 and so on...
Price still has upside but when this is breeched, all it is saying that lower prices are in order.
petty,
did someone taught you that?
the method you use is extremely familiar.
I tried the 200% expansion explanation here long time ago (a year+ ??) and at that time, no one listen. =)
did someone taught you that?
the method you use is extremely familiar.
I tried the 200% expansion explanation here long time ago (a year+ ??) and at that time, no one listen. =)
Schizo-the proof is in the pudding. many people complicate trading and I have a certain skill-set to uncomplicated it. At the core of it all you could give me a running ticker showing time/price for a contract, pencil, paper and I can derive trades. It is just how I learned to trade and it works for me and a lot of other professional traders.
This is valuable to people who do not know how to trade and/or struggling. In no way am I trying to waltz in here and tell you how to trade.
I am here to help, thats all. But your candor and criticism is needed as well, to offer other readers of my post another perspective, so thank you for being one of those voices.
It is why open forums work and naturally weed out bull crap.
How predictable... After your first 5 posts I already saw that the sales pitch was coming.
Now let me get something straight, I don't have anything against teaching for money. But:
1. You should be able to back it up with trades or predictions. We already know about the summary of your trades, and your predictions and analysis are ambiguous...
2. Be open about it, like Austin....
Anyhow, I think it is time I put you on Ignore...
P.S.: If Emg wants to teach us how he comes up with those entry, I am a buyer!
- Status