ES Journal Archive (2009 - 2010)

volente_00 · May 5, 2010

Quote from volente_00:

High probability we test 1150 before 1225 amigo

don't let the bears chop your head off the shoulders.

http://quotes.ino.com/chart/index.html?s=CME_ES.M10.E&t=&a=&w=&v=d1

stay thirsty my friend

volente_00 · May 5, 2010

Quote from Lawrence Chan:

vol,

55 tagged but not staying there long enough.

What's your take on that?

spy 114 -120 range

magic formula says 1138 es is max downside on low.

remember the gap from monday's close. I have a strong feeling it comes back into play in the future.

Decel · May 5, 2010

Quote from volente_00:spy 114 -120 range

magic formula says 1138 es is max downside on low.

remember the gap from monday's close. I have a strong feeling it comes back into play in the future.

To summarize, we're going down more, but will bounce after to close gap?

ksonsinc · May 5, 2010

any one playing h & S on the Es which has just developed

tomahawk · May 5, 2010

Quote from ksonsinc:

any one playing h & S on the Es which has just developed

Intraday trend is still up and gap not filled yet ... (2nd consec. day unfilled down gap, too).

tomahawk · May 5, 2010

Quote from tomahawk:

Intraday trend is still up and gap not filled yet ... (2nd consec. day unfilled down gap, too).

Gap now filled on ES and SPX.

ksonsinc · May 5, 2010

so what # should be look for it to fill the g ap 1172 ?

tomahawk · May 5, 2010

Quote from ksonsinc:

so what # should be look for it to fill the g ap 1172 ?

I have 71.75 for ES gap fill.

Pekelo · May 5, 2010

Quote from tomahawk:

Gap now filled on ES and SPX.

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=75045&highlight=2nd+gap+rule

"2nd gaps in the same direction close on the same day pretty much all of the time."

tomahawk · May 5, 2010

Quote from Pekelo:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=75045&highlight=2nd+gap+rule

"2nd gaps in the same direction close on the same day pretty much all of the time."

Yep ... I should've credited you with that one when I brought it up a few pages back, since you're the original source on the idea. (.... apologies)