M M3peat Oct 30, 2009 #23,051 Quote from Lawrence Chan: =D More... Should it be bouncing up around here?
Lawrence Chan Oct 30, 2009 #23,053 Quote from M3peat: Should it be bouncing up around here? More... Why? A bounce from previous day low with w.spring will send it back to VWAP. But going down to fill the gap is more likely.
Quote from M3peat: Should it be bouncing up around here? More... Why? A bounce from previous day low with w.spring will send it back to VWAP. But going down to fill the gap is more likely.
W wave Oct 30, 2009 #23,054 once again she is sitting right on the line, you know the deal, pop, drop or little drop and pop. Chips are on # 1 again.
once again she is sitting right on the line, you know the deal, pop, drop or little drop and pop. Chips are on # 1 again.
Lawrence Chan Oct 30, 2009 #23,055 Quote from ASusilovic: Unbelievable Wall Street idiots. More... They thought they are bigger than the whole world.
Quote from ASusilovic: Unbelievable Wall Street idiots. More... They thought they are bigger than the whole world.
S stella Oct 30, 2009 #23,059 There should be support here, it should bounce. Then again, I'm done for the day...
M M3peat Oct 30, 2009 #23,060 Quote from Lawrence Chan: Why? A bounce from previous day low with w.spring will send it back to VWAP. But going down to fill the gap is more likely. More... I guess I'm trying to understand what you meant when you said this earlier: "49 first. Edit: if PP at 6.75 is taken out from below, then previous day high + more!"
Quote from Lawrence Chan: Why? A bounce from previous day low with w.spring will send it back to VWAP. But going down to fill the gap is more likely. More... I guess I'm trying to understand what you meant when you said this earlier: "49 first. Edit: if PP at 6.75 is taken out from below, then previous day high + more!"