ES Journal Archive (2009 - 2010)

saliva · Mar 30, 2009

Quote from trackstar:

Anyone else seeing the long entry from here to 780?

edit: I see Sal is...

It looked like a double-bottom would be in play at 87. But the buying pressure soon fizzled. I'm a bit hesitant to short at this point.

Lawrence Chan · Mar 30, 2009

Quote from Lawrence Chan:

The fight to hold will come from NQ, not ES.

Watch that for timing.

If EOM + EOQ op ex does not finish at same level (760-770), then 800 is where it will park.

trackstar · Mar 30, 2009

Quote from saliva:

It looked like a double-bottom would be in play at 87. But the buying pressure soon fizzled. I'm a bit hesitant to short at this point.

I saw the same thing earlier. Anyway, no way I am going to be caught short from anything lower than 790. 91-93 would be a good spot.

saliva · Mar 30, 2009

Quote from trackstar:

I saw the same thing earlier. Anyway, no way I am going to be caught short from anything lower than 790. 91-93 would be a good spot.

I'm sure the same idiots who applied the brake at 666 will place the damper at 777.

Cutten · Mar 30, 2009

Quote from startraitor:

Enough captial, a long enough timeframe and a weak regulatory system and you can break the pound or bring a country to it's knees, that's my only point.

Ignorant comment.

trackstar · Mar 30, 2009

Quote from saliva:

I'm sure the same idiots who applied the brake at 666 will place the damper at 777.

LOL Thats pretty much where my down channel says stop.

saliva · Mar 30, 2009

Will real miguel_s please stand up?

startraitor · Mar 30, 2009

Excellent retort, look forward to more of your brilliance, just not on this journal please.

Quote from Cutten:

Ignorant comment.

saliva · Mar 30, 2009

Long 83.75

riskymove · Mar 30, 2009

Quote from Lawrence Chan:

The fight to hold will come from NQ, not ES.

Watch that for timing.

Looks ok so far with a little double bottom on the NQ. Going to be watching.

Nice entry saliva.