ES Journal Archive (2009 - 2010)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Expiration Week Performance statistics from Schaeffer's Investment Research:
"While the past few years have been pretty rough for the market, the same cannot be said for expiration week returns. In fact, since the beginning of 2006, the S&P 500 Index (SPX) has finished in positive territory during expiration weeks a majority of the time (68%), with an average return of 0.28%. Meanwhile, non-expiration weeks have been pitiful, with the SPX closing in negative territory more than half the time, with an average loss of 0.31%. .....
During the past year, there's been good news and bad news for market returns during expiration weeks. The good news is that the SPX finished positive in 9 of the 12 expiration weeks, with an average return of 0.47%. The bad news is that 3 of those weeks were not only just negative, they were alarmingly so, showing an average loss of more than 5%. That is an extremely big swing, especially for option players. In short, during the past year, expiration week has usually been good, but when it's bad, it is really bad.

....

Last week was arduous, as the SPX fell 4.8%. Is it significant when the week prior to expiration makes a big move down? Unfortunately, looking at SPX returns since 2000 when the index was off more than 3% in the week prior to expiration reveals a more bearish situation. Six of the 10 weeks are positive, but the average loss is 0.77%. Holding with the pattern indicated above, negative weeks tend to be especially unpleasant, with an average loss of 5.47%.
"
 
No. It would be an inverted H&S if you want to stretch it, but the 3rd bottom is always lower then the first 2 and the first 2 are app. on the same level.

Also Metastock isn't broken, I could argue that it already played out. The long signal was at 845ish and the very next day we did 875+ and a week later again 870... There is no exit signal in Metastock and sometimes the recommendation is valid only for a very short period...
 
i was thinking the dragon was similar to a dbl-top or dbl- bottom. entry being the break of trendline.. what i have failed to understand regarding pek's comments is the "dragon failure".. (if i recall his terminology correctly). is it a failed trendline break? (from what i've seen - i don't think so)
 
Quote from BigBubba:

i was thinking the dragon was similar to a dbl-top or dbl- bottom.... the "dragon failure"..

It is similar because it is a failed doublebottom formation that makes a 3rd, lower bottom. I thought I was rather clear about it. I will start a separate thread about it today, but really, I can't explain it in a simpler way than I already did in this thread.
 
looking forward 2 it



Quote from Pekelo:

It is similar because it is a failed doublebottom formation that makes a 3rd, lower bottom. I thought I was rather clear about it. I will start a separate thread about it today, but really, I can't explain it in a simpler way than I already did in this thread.
 
Bonds dropping, Yen dropping, maybe a little rally time.

FYI - EVERYONE email your senators and congressmen on HR 1068 - the transaction tax. We're all dead if that goes through. If you would like a simple form letter to mail them, PM me. I will gladly hook you up with my own.
 
Quote from startraitor:

long 86 for overnight updrift, stop under 80, target 97+

Nice entry! AH high was 96.25....

Although yesterday wasn't a classic SDD the overnight long worked, so we should expect a shortable top around 10 am...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top