ES Journal Archive (2006 - 2008)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from MandelbrotSet:

This Opening is sooooooooo bogus, they're going to drop it down hard as soon as they're fully positioned with their shorts.
Well, the hard part hasn't come yet, but I got what I needed so I'm off.

Have a nice trading day.
 
Quote from vertigo3:

LC,
pardon my ignorance.

could you please offer a little of the rationale for under 1200 (related to SEC short-sale jazz).

as to current intraday market,
even though there is a (what appears to me to be a bearish wedge on the 60min), but the lower TL has not been broken. Price intraday might have to push deeper into resistance and print 71.50-74.00 before reversing.

S&P has 35% of its weighting related to the banking sector.

If we have only 1/2 the # of shares available for plain short selling, then most traders who trade these stocks are forced to either stay on the sideline, or, pick bottom.

That means, it is no longer a cushion for slowing down a further drop in the financial sector. Instead, like a trend sell day, those who pick the bottom get kill along the way.

So the financial sector can slide back down at double the speed we've seen over the past 2 months. At the same time, oil stocks are suffering due to weakness in oil price.

1200 was printed with the 2 sectors balancing out each other.

If both are going down, we would see 1200 very fast.

The big if is that the # of shares available for short is not artificially reduced by any means, then the new rule would make no difference ...
 
Very interesting how they chose not to take out 1269.50. Was short from 1257 with 1% stop. Back to 1257 was a given.

57 will offer a bounce.
 
Quote from jjf:

WTG
What made you so certain of 57

After the open, the market fell around a point short of the overnight high. The overnight low was 1256. A failed test of one extreme suggests a failed test of the other, extreme meaning R1/S2, yesterday's high/low, overnight high/low.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top