Quote from traderwann:
Ok so I'm new here and I'm sure I'll regret posting this after being continuously flamed. Anyhoo, it is completely IRRELEVANT whether someone actually traded or paper traded or just watched.
Look at it this way, an example. There are two traders both trading the exact same system. One trader is making millions with 200+ contracts and the other is paper trading. Now, the paper trader posts here and the real trader doesn't. See? It's whether the system works that matters, not whether it's "verifiably traded" by you me or Joe or Jill or Bob. Heck, give me a chat room or message board where someone paper trades successful moves all day long and I'll pay money for free money in return! Frankly, whether they just passing the dutchie to the left hand side without any idea of how a trading platform works or what it is, really doesn't matter. What matters is whether the trade(s) work and whether it was posted before the fact. Whether anyone took it is, again, more than 110% irrelevant.
On the idea of verification. The level was called in advance. PERIOD. Do you have short term memory? Either the level worked or it didn't. Period. Whether someone took a trade +.50 points or -.75 points or bang on at XXXX.XX, it doesn't matter, it's completely irrelevant.
I miss trades all the time because I can't always pull the trigger. This by no means affects the validity or accuracy of a system and neither does whether someone holds your hand posting an exact entry after giving you an exact level hours before hand. Either the post was before the deal or it wasn't. Either the trade worked or it didn't. End of story. Fade or trade!
I agree no one has a right to brag about losing trades, but, as another example, a system developer that simulates trades historically and doesn't even paper trade in real time, has EVERY right to brag about a successful methodology.