Were you trading at the time? Coincidence or not, it was a scarry time.S&P did come to a halt right at 666 previously. Coincidence?
Were you trading at the time? Coincidence or not, it was a scarry time.S&P did come to a halt right at 666 previously. Coincidence?
Were you trading at the time? Coincidence or not, it was a scarry time.
ES did hit weekly resistance and only briefly traded above, but wasn't really expecting or prepared for a short, so not in anything. It's not really down that much points wise, but the gap + action afterwards doesn't look great. Have Meta for another catalyst tomorrow though. Don't really see much right now, will see if overnight changes anything.
Kind of scary imo if this is all the upside the weekly regain is going to provide.
We've retraced nearly 50% from the low and that's considered the standard practice. Anything more than that, you're asking for trouble.ES did hit weekly resistance and only briefly traded above, but wasn't really expecting or prepared for a short, so not in anything. It's not really down that much points wise, but the gap + action afterwards doesn't look great. Have Meta for another catalyst tomorrow though. Don't really see much right now, will see if overnight changes anything.
Kind of scary imo if this is all the upside the weekly regain is going to provide.

Interesting that RTY is only down slightly, especially after the day it had.
Not yet. Trade hasn't moved far enough in my favor yet.Now that there has been a technical move of over 100 handles and the trade being counter-trend, it will be interesting to see if @B1S2 adjusts his stop.
RTY also never broke it's weekly relative lows, when ES and NQ did and also recall it holding up better some days relatively speaking. So, have been noticing that about RTY, it just didn't seem to really matter much or help my analysis much. Simply because even thought it held up better it didn't stop NQ and ES from dumping still below it's relative weeky lows.