yes--certainlywould seem like only a large rally into the close would be needed to undo what you're seeing, correct?
yes--certainlywould seem like only a large rally into the close would be needed to undo what you're seeing, correct?
timeframe is weeks to 6 months.How do you define longer term downtrend? We made all time highs only a few days ago. Is your time horizon only a few days?
Interesting .. so you have an unconventional way of defining trend ..timeframe is weeks to 6 months.
I try to define it in advance. When I say we are in downtrend , I typically mean that I think shorts have a better chance of success. I'm generally early.Interesting .. so you have an unconventional way of defining trend ..
I try to define it in advance. When I say we are in downtrend , I typically mean that I think shorts have a better chance of success. I'm generally early.
I typically use weekly charts to define longer term trend. To me, this chart looks like downtrend.Ok, I'll ask this question another way. How many days of data do you use to define trend? A few days or do you utilise information going back weeks or months?
Rising bond yields / further curve steepening could definitely end the party, especially if oil prices accelerate higher. Another is some surprise legislation in response to the Gamestop story. I can't remember which one, but I read that hiking margins triggered one crash.
Although it doesn't take much to prick a bubble. It was hard to pinpoint a single factor that caused 1987. The best I could find was Treasury Secretary James Baker having a trade dispute with Germany.
False. The 87 crash happened when James Baker made comments over the weekend that they were going to "let the dollar go"1987 crash caused by Robert Prechter when he put out a sell signal.
That was a joke, but it was funny during that time how he could move markets. Barron's calledFalse. The 87 crash happened when James Baker made comments over the weekend that they were going to "let the dollar go"