ES Journal - 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from Laissez Faire:

Today I decided to take a look at how many gaps were filled on the same day for the last years. I used the same lookback period as yesterday, starting from 2008 to the 2nd of March last Friday, but for this I used daily SPY data.

Gap up
Number of days gap up: 554
Number of gap fills on the same day: 380
Percentage filled: 68,59 %

Flat
Number of days with flat open: 4

Gap down
Number of days gap down: 493
Number of gap fills on the same day: 354
Percentage filled: 71,81 %

Now, this is only a look at the surface and probably not useful for anything alone, but I`m still getting my feet wet with this stuff and playing around with it.

It does not say anything about the size of the gaps and one could argue that very small gaps should not be counted as a gap day, but as a flat open.

Probably not useful alone, but if one adds more parameters and conditions, it could perhaps yield some interesting results.

As an example, one could perhaps look at the distribution of the size of the gaps and see if it is possible to predict anything with regards to the size of the gap given certain conditions, i.e., are small gaps filled more frequently than large ones. Is there a bigger chance that we trade in the direction of the gap if it is a large one? Anything to gather from the previous day`s close in relation to the gap?

More coffee please. :)

FYI...masterthegap.com already did some legwork...
 
LF, you might like to discuss this with Lawrence Chan. His site has useful information. I don't know much about the merits of the data or what benefits could be had.

I think,LC may be a good source as he has posted some specific conditions that were spot on.
 
Quote from tihfa:

FYI...masterthegap.com already did some legwork...

Might get some good ideas there, but I feel more confident about the statistics if I`ve done them myself. :)

Quote from Macho:

LF, you might like to discuss this with Lawrence Chan. His site has useful information. I don't know much about the merits of the data or what benefits could be had.

I think, LC may be a good source as he has posted some specific conditions that were spot on.

Thanks.

Actually, I already picked up a lot of great stuff from Lawrence and I believe I have recommended his work several times both here and in PMs.

So yes, I agree. :)
 
Quote from JoshDance:

added 1 and looking to take that off around 49

stop to 45.50 on other 2

targets above 51.75 and 58.00

filled at 49 for +3 on 1
stop at 46.25 on remaining 2
targets 51.75, and 58.00
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top