FB ...
Thanks for the analysis. I will be sticking with NQ for the moment as all that you have said makes sense to me.
Under fairly "normal" conditions what do you think of an initial stop eight ticks back, moving my stop to break even once I have eight ticks in the trade and beginning to protect half my profit when I am plus 16 ticks in the trade?
If you think I am too tight with this as a basic guideline, would a stop ten ticks back and pulling to break even with 10 ticks of paper profit be more reasonable?
I frequently enter on a stop off a setup and don't just sit there and wait for the stop to be hit if I don't like how it goes through. Instead I trade-out at the market whenever it doesn't feel right. This has saved me $$ and also had me exiting trades that went on to do well. On balance it has paid off.
Thanks for the analysis. I will be sticking with NQ for the moment as all that you have said makes sense to me.
Under fairly "normal" conditions what do you think of an initial stop eight ticks back, moving my stop to break even once I have eight ticks in the trade and beginning to protect half my profit when I am plus 16 ticks in the trade?
If you think I am too tight with this as a basic guideline, would a stop ten ticks back and pulling to break even with 10 ticks of paper profit be more reasonable?
I frequently enter on a stop off a setup and don't just sit there and wait for the stop to be hit if I don't like how it goes through. Instead I trade-out at the market whenever it doesn't feel right. This has saved me $$ and also had me exiting trades that went on to do well. On balance it has paid off.
Quote from FB123:
If you are trading for longer moves, stick with NQ until you have built up a fair bit more money.