hmmm, looks like proflogic has a doppleganger.
identical styles and words, hmmmmmmm.....
funny, the seminar business must be bad...

identical styles and words, hmmmmmmm.....
funny, the seminar business must be bad...


Quote from brokerbroker:
hmmm, looks like proflogic has a doppleganger.
identical styles and words, hmmmmmmm.....
funny, the seminar business must be bad...
![]()
![]()
![]()
If you are, then this approach cannot be programmed i.e. put into computer code, correct ?Quote from marketpath:
OK, here goes.
Pivots (in price) are determined by TRIX. Higher Highs, Higher Lows is a little misleading, because I am not looking for 3-4 HHs, HLs in a row before something happens. I am interested only in breaches of the previous TRIX highs/lows.
Ok, looking at the chart I posted, the first HH (breach) I marked is not a price pivot. Why? Because the following low (marked with the arrow) did not breach the previous low, so the pivot high is UNCONFIRMED.
So it goes back up, new HH in the TRIX, comes back down, still no breach of previous TRIX low, so still unconfirmed. Then, this is where it gets weird. Price goes up higher, but the TRIX did not -it made a LH. So that makes that price top around 654 unimportant (sort of, but I will get to that in a minute), but not a pivot.
Then, price drops and the TRIX does also,and this time breaches the previous TRIX low. Now the pivot top, at 649.80, has been confirmed as a top.
Im losing everyone aren't I.....?![]()
Quote from marketsurfer:
these claimed objective methods have heavy subjective under/over tones regardless of the words used to describe them. pretty silly actually.
surf
Quote from RedRat:
Hi ProfLogic,
Can I ask you why don't you intraday trade the ER2?
Thanks