So then merely imagining a hell is a sufficient counterbalance to make up the other side of the coin? However, the evil that exists in the here and now is real and not only imagined. Why does a god allow the perpetration of actual evil on real lives, when the mere imagining of it apparently suffices? Seems rather over the top, wouldn't you say? Unnecessarily heavy-handed on the ever merciful god's part.Quote from Ricter:
Why not? The heaven believers I've read imagine a hell.
Quote from Gabfly1:
So then merely imagining a hell is a sufficient counterbalance to make up the other side of the coin? However, the evil that exists in the here and now is real and not only imagined. Why does a god allow the perpetration of actual evil on real lives, when the mere imagining of it apparently suffices? Seems rather over the top, wouldn't you say? Unnecessarily heavy-handed on the ever merciful god's part.
Quote from Gabfly1:
...if there must be hell to appreciate heaven, then how can a mere human lifetime of hell be sufficient to fully and properly appreciate an eternity of heaven. Seems rather asymmetric, don't you think?
Quote from Gabfly1:
And whom do we thank for the evil we have been blessed with to give us context?
Speaking of context:
1. That's a rather hefty price to pay for the privilege of having judgment, wouldn't you say?Quote from Ricter:
1. If we believe in God, we would have to thank Him for evil (and good) if we want to retain our ability to judge; the ability to give thanks (or criticism), of course.
2. I'm borrowing here, but someone said that to ask why God would create a universe with evil in it is about the same as asking why He would create a universe with length, width, or height.
Round and round we go...Quote from Gabfly1:
And yet he [god] couldn't be bothered to make himself definitively known to everyone in no uncertain terms, so that there could be no possible room for any other interpretation. Instead, he reportedly requires his followers to exercise unyielding faith, thereby suspending logic and critical thinking. Meanwhile, what separates us from all other living creatures on this planet is the disproportionate size of our prefrontal cortex, which gives us our ability to think critically and logically. So, god, in his infinite wisdom, supposedly wants us to suspend and abandon the very thing that defines us as a species in order to secure salvation. My only question is: what was he smoking when he came up with this sitcom premise?
Quote from Gabfly1:
Epicurus: Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Quote from Ricter:
If we believe in God, we would have to thank Him for evil (and good) if we want to retain our ability to judge; the ability to give thanks (or criticism), of course.
I'm borrowing here, but someone said that to ask why God would create a universe with evil in it is about the same as asking why He would create a universe with length, width, or height.
Quote from CaptainObvious:
And yet even the great Epicurus did not deny the existance of God(s).
Instead, he stated that what gods there may be do not concern themselves with us, and thus would not seek to punish us either in this or any other life.