EPA gets rid of "Climate Change" nonsense on website

And then there's the fact that no respected publishing climate scientist denies man made global warming. None.

That's because CO2 has certain physical properties that make it like the glass in a greenhouse.
 
Mankind, has never seen levels of CO2 this high.

CO2_history_1024.jpg
 
so you are grafting ice core data onto thermometer or instrument records...
and you think that means man made co2 is causing warming?

that is statistical noise caused by a change in measurement...

here is context... we are close to the bottom of the historical record for temps and co2... just a bit from where all plants die off because of too little CO2.
yet you think your chart shows something?

til you have some real science showing man made co2 causes warming your chart simply shows instruments vs proxy data needs to be better reconciled.
especially since the current proxy data contraindicates that temperature spike.

look at that chart below... in context our temperature and our co2 are very low.
6a010536b58035970c0162fe374e65970d-400wi






Mankind, has never seen levels of CO2 this high.

CO2_history_1024.jpg
 
Last edited:
We are discussing if you can find anything that is scientifically wrong in a paper from a respected scientists?

As a side note, let's see if you can find the old posts of mine where I claimed it was peer-reviewed.

How do I know it was published by the 'respected' scientists when they are not linking it in their own home pages

You already lied about it being peer reviewed, how do I know it's even from the scientists you are claiming?
 
It's actually pretty scary when the govt ignores facts to further their agenda
so you are grafting ice core data onto thermometer or instrument records...
and you think that means man made co2 is causing warming?

that is statistical noise caused by a change in measurement...

here is context... we are close to the bottom of the historical record for temps and co2... just a bit from where all plants die off because of too little CO2.
yet you think your chart shows something?

til you have some real science showing man made co2 causes warming your chart simply shows instruments vs proxy data needs to be better reconciled.
especially since the current proxy data contraindicates that temperature spike.

look at that chart below... in context our temperature and our co2 are very low.
6a010536b58035970c0162fe374e65970d-400wi

Irrelevant time scale. Nice obfuscation though.
Get back to us when you are a publishing climate scientist. Like the members of this organization....


  • 478_americanchemicalsociety_320x240.jpg

    American Chemical Society
    "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem."
  • 479_americangeophysicalunion_320x240.jpg

    American Geophysical Union
    "Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes."
 
its pretty funny when there is no science showing that man made co2 causes warming... and it took the govt this long to take propaganda down.

but at least we can say...
good job Mr. President... futurecurrents has lost a big piece of propaganda.
 
its pretty funny when there is no science showing that man made co2 causes warming... and it took the govt this long to take propaganda down.

but at least we can say...
good job Mr. President... futurecurrents has lost a big piece of propaganda.

LOL

The Earth's climate is changing. Temperatures are rising, snow and rainfall patterns are shifting, and more extreme climate events – like heavy rainstorms and record high temperatures – are already happening. Many of these observed changes are linked to the rising levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in our atmosphere, caused by human activities.

EPA partners with more than 40 data contributors from various government agencies, academic institutions, and other organizations to compile a key set of indicators related to the causes and effects of climate change. The indicators are published in EPA's report, Climate Change Indicators in the United States, available on this website and in print. Explore the indicators below.

https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators

Trump University graduates are easily fooled. A notorious liar who hires a oil company lobbyist while Breitbart scientific research council pushes fake peer reviewed papers and the Cons go, give me more!
 
Why don't the Cons say the same about cancer and other diseases is what I am wondering.

Cancer must be a political liberal conspiracy since scientists around the world agree it's real.


They actually did for a while... The tobacco guys had to go before Congress to explain themselves.

Wouldn't surprise me if the asbestos guys did the same.

In contrast with nuclear, which was historically ran by scientists and not pencil pushers, so the effects of radiation were studied and well understood.
 
you all are so childish in your scientific arguments.
words don't count... real science and real data counts.
I don't really care if we are warming or not.
I just wish you spent even 10 minutes learning the subject.

I would like one of you clowns to get past the first threshold for showing man made co2 is causing warming...


using the best statistical methods and the raw temperature data... why don't you show us how we are warming outside natural variation. show us with real science and data.... not bullshit.
 
The Arctic Ice [it's in the northern hemisphere in case the GW people don't know] has grown very significantly in recent times. The northern hemi is where all the pollution is. I'm seeing no correlation between manmade air pollution and temperatures at all. I'm also not seeing the news about the Arctic Ice in the MSM United Nations propaganda outlets...
 
Back
Top