EPA gets rid of "Climate Change" nonsense on website

So you/Breitbart claim that it's peer reviewed but it's not but that's everyone else's fault for your lying????

Bottomline : You cons are such disingenuous liars who can't keep their simple lies straight, why would anyone believe any of your claims? You cons can't tell a fake paper from a real one but you are the one lecturing about scientific support? Give me a break.

Nice fantasy you have there. We provided info right up front showing the list of distinguished scientists listed in the paper that reviewed it, and outlined that it was in the process of formal peer review and publication in a journal.

Is there anything in the content of the paper you can point to and state it is factually or scientifically incorrect? Please provide your citations showing what sections present information you dispute and why you dispute it.
 
Nice fantasy you have there. We provided info right up front showing the list of distinguished scientists listed in the paper that reviewed it, and outlined that it was in the process of formal peer review and publication in a journal.

Is there anything in the content of the paper you can point to and state it is factually or scientifically incorrect? Please provide your citations showing what sections present information you dispute and why you dispute it.

Whoever asked you for 'distinguished' list?

You claimed the paper was PEER REVIEWED which is a technical term

Turns out it wasn't, why would anyone believe rest of your 'distinguished' claim when the first claim was a lie?

If the TITLE of your claim was wrong, why would anyone waste their time with the content?

You can't even provide a proper link from where the study was released, a random wordpress blog is all you got. How do I know that any of the 'distinguished' scientists were even involved if they are not vouching for it on their own home pages?

Nice try, get caught in a lie and then defend some other claim ignoring the original lie. Works at Breitbart, not here.
 
Whoever asked you for 'distinguished' list?

You claimed the paper was PEER REVIEWED which is a technical term

Turns out it wasn't, why would anyone believe rest of your 'distinguished' claim when the first claim was a lie?

If the TITLE of your claim was wrong, why would anyone waste their time with the content?

You can't even provide a proper link from where the study was released, a random wordpress blog is all you got. How do I know that any of the 'distinguished' scientists were even involved if they are not vouching for it on their own home pages?

Nice try, get caught in a lie and then defend some other claim ignoring the original lie. Works at Breitbart, not here.

Why don't you read the old posts.... you are obviously in fantasy land. Stop re-writing history.

So you can find nothing wrong with the scientific content of the paper, eh?
 
Why don't you read the old posts.... you are obviously in fantasy land. Stop re-writing history.

So you can find nothing wrong with the scientific content of the paper, eh?

The old posts say that the paper is PEER REVIEWED

The old posts are complete lies and fabrications which is what we are discussing.

What is the point of asking me to read lies again?

What scientific content of the paper? If I cant trust the title, its source, why would I waste my time going through it's contents?
 
If someone wants to know what the actual scientists think...

1309_consensus-graphic-2015-768px.jpg


Temperature data from four international science institutions. All show rapid warming in the past few decades and that the last decade has been the warmest on record. Data sources: NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, NOAA National Climatic Data Center, Met Office Hadley Centre/Climatic Research Unit and the Japanese Meteorological Agency.

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1 show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2

  • 476_AAAS_320x240.jpg

    American Association for the Advancement of Science
    "The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3
  • 478_americanchemicalsociety_320x240.jpg

    American Chemical Society
    "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4
  • 479_americangeophysicalunion_320x240.jpg

    American Geophysical Union
    "Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5
  • 480_americanmedicalassociation_320x240.jpg

    American Medical Association
    "Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2013)6
  • 481_americanmeteorologicalsociety_320x240.jpg

    American Meteorological Society
    "It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7
  • 482_americanphysicalsociety_320x240.jpg

    American Physical Society
    "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8
  • 484_geologicalsocietyamerica_320x240.jpg

    The Geological Society of America
    "The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9
SCIENCE ACADEMIES
International academies: Joint statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10

  • 485_nationalacademyscience_320x240.jpg

    U.S. National Academy of Sciences
    "The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify taking steps to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere." (2005)11
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
  • 486_usgcrp_320x240.jpg

    U.S. Global Change Research Program
    "The global warming of the past 50 years is due primarily to human-induced increases in heat-trapping gases. Human 'fingerprints' also have been identified in many other aspects of the climate system, including changes in ocean heat content, precipitation, atmospheric moisture, and Arctic sea ice." (2009, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12
INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES
  • 487_ipcc_320x240.jpg

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
    “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia. The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, and sea level has risen.”13

    “Human influence on the climate system is clear, and recent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are the highest in history. Recent climate changes have had widespread impacts on human and natural systems.”14
 
The old posts say that the paper is PEER REVIEWED

The old posts are complete lies and fabrications which is what we are discussing.

What is the point of asking me to read lies again?

What scientific content of the paper? If I cant trust the title, its source, why would I waste my time going through it's contents?

We are discussing if you can find anything that is scientifically wrong in a paper from a respected scientists?

As a side note, let's see if you can find the old posts of mine where I claimed it was peer-reviewed.
 
And the Weather Channel's statement...................


Earth’s climate is indeed warming. Global surface temperature has increased by around 1.8°F (1.0°C) since the late 1800s. More than half of this increase has occurred since the 1970s, and every decade since then has been warmer than the one before it.

Major changes in global climate have occurred throughout our planet's history – long before humans could possibly have been a factor. Researchers overwhelmingly agree that the main cause of recent global warming is the addition of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere (primarily carbon dioxide) through the burning of fossil fuels. Greenhouse gases warm the climate by allowing sunlight to reach Earth but absorbing radiation from Earth before it escapes to space. The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased every year for more than 60 years; it is now about 30% greater than it was in the 1950s.

Some impacts of our warming climate are global. This includes sea level, which is rising around the world as glaciers melt and the oceans warm and expand. Other effects of global warming vary by region and season. Temperatures are rising especially fast in the Arctic, where the rapid loss of sea ice and thawing of permafrost has major implications for people, wildlife and ecosystems.

Global warming affects moisture as well as temperature. As our warming climate causes more water to evaporate from the oceans, the heaviest rains and snows are becoming even heavier in many parts of the world. Meanwhile, higher temperatures exacerbate the impacts of drought by pulling more moisture from already-dry soils and plants.


https://weather.com/science/environ...g-weather-channel-position-statement-20141029
 
Exxon Mobil...


Our position on climate change


We have the same concerns as people everywhere – and that is how to provide the world with the energy it needs while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The risk of climate change is clear and the risk warrants action. Increasing carbon emissions in the atmosphere are having a warming effect. There is a broad scientific and policy consensus that action must be taken to further quantify and assess the risks.

ExxonMobil is taking action by reducing greenhouse gas emissions in its operations, helping consumers reduce their emissions, supporting research that leads to technology breakthroughs and participating in constructive dialogue on policy options.

Addressing climate change, providing economic opportunity and lifting billions out of poverty are complex and interrelated issues requiring complex solutions. There is a consensus that comprehensive strategies are needed to respond to these risks.
 
Back
Top