EPA gets rid of "Climate Change" nonsense on website

G

gwb-trading

Aren't you the guy who posted a Breitbart link about a fake climate change paper? We should all rely on the Con brain trust on these scientific matters, especially the ones who can't tell fake from real scientific papers.
 
we have posted hundreds dozens of peer reviewed papers showing climate is influenced by natural causes such as the sun and the tides and change in ocean temps.

Your side has no peer reviewed evidence stating man made co2 causes warming.
Until you have science.

This is great thing that we are not going to destroy our freedom and our economy with fake science and fake remedies.

CO2 may have the earth feed the population explosion. So until you have sciences stating man made CO2 is causing harm... you may shut up about this.
 
exGOPer said:
Aren't you the guy who posted a Breitbart link about a fake climate change paper? We should all rely on the Con brain trust on these scientific matters, especially the ones who can't tell fake from real scientific papers.
More...

Nice claim -- the author of the paper is well-respected scientist. The paper has not been formally peer reviewed yet but is in the process. There is a list of scientists supporting the paper listed at the back of the paper. What makes this paper "fake" -- only that you disagree with the scientific observations, measurements, and conclusions.

Bottom line: The "Climate Change" movement is going to fall apart over the next decade after a string of revelations continuously reveals that there is no realistic scientific support for its political agenda.
 
we are the ones on the side of real science.

show us the science that says man made co2 is causing warming.
show us the science that shows we are warming outside of natural variation.
(please use the best statistical tools.)


As a conservative I believe in conserving the environment.
If there were any science showing that man made co2 was causing warming...
the scientists finding it would have nobel prizes.


Here4money said:
So glad politicians are in charge of science now
More...
 
exGOPer said:
Aren't you the guy who posted a Breitbart link about a fake climate change paper? We should all rely on the Con brain trust on these scientific matters, especially the ones who can't tell fake from real scientific papers.
More...
Says the guy that apparently thinks that $100,000 in Facebook is a grand conspiracy and altered the election.
 
gwb-trading said:
Nice claim -- the author of the paper is well-respected scientist. The paper has not been formally peer reviewed yet but is in the process. There is a list of scientists supporting the paper listed at the back of the paper. What makes this paper "fake" -- only that you disagree with the scientific observations, measurements, and conclusions.

Bottom line: The "Climate Change" movement is going to fall apart over the next decade after a string of revelations continuously reveals that there is no realistic scientific support for its political agenda.
More...

So you/Breitbart claim that it's peer reviewed but it's not but that's everyone else's fault for your lying????

Bottomline : You cons are such disingenuous liars who can't keep their simple lies straight, why would anyone believe any of your claims? You cons can't tell a fake paper from a real one but you are the one lecturing about scientific support? Give me a break.
 
WeToddDid2 said:
Says the guy that apparently thinks that $100,000 in Facebook is a grand conspiracy and altered the election.
More...

Then why is Trump's DOJ investigating all this if it was all a nothingburger?

And how do you know Russians only spent 100k?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top