Quote from slapshot:
First off, you are a sarcastic little dickhead. There is no reason to resort to juvenille insults during a mild debate. You should seek help for your antisocial personality disorder.
Second, it is not worth talking to you about this. You offer no refutation based on logic or facts or math, only insults and blind faith in some study that you seem to think is "robust".
You offer no mathematical proof, just a baseless opinion. And you are just plain dead wrong about this topic. Which given your lack of comprehension of what I wrote, is evident for all to see.
You are also wrong about one trader's executions or conclusions being invalid. Since every single trader executes differently, with a different style and expectancy, the ONLY valid stats are the ones that trader generates in his/her own real trading, with all real-life dynamic factors included.
It is the so-called studies that try to blanket all of the dynamic trading world with static conclusions that are statistically invalid. And that has led to so much myth and misinformation in the trading world.
Good luck with your own trading, let's move on now.
cannot get through. Too much interference, as there is complete ignorance about scientific, mathematic or statistical validity.
Yes, lets move on...
