When I first noticed you begin posting here again frequently (apparently you had taken a break), you seemed to be a guy who would look at data and make informed, supportable assertions. But now you just seem to be hacking for Romney, or at least "not Obama", even on factors which Obama has little control over. Is his big crime saying he has control over them, and disappointing you? All politicians make promises. All, so Romney's included. If you stick with data, logic, sound analysis you can't go wrong, regardless of who's in power. BUT, you might sound like a leftie. Maybe that's your fear...
Entire ME imploding
- Thread starter CaptainObvious
- Start date
What I first noticed about CO was that his biggest gripe was about wall street and how they fucked the US.Now he's fully supporting a former wall street guy who will let them run wild again
Quote from AK Forty Seven:
US.Now he's fully supporting a former wall street guy who will let them run wild again
I'll tell you, we need to support some wall street people. None of us here are going to hit the big one playing penny poker with mother teresa.
Serioulsy I made out okay with a no doc no income loan a fluffy appraisal a couple refi's.. and so on and so forth....
Look at the damage Bush let them do and look at how they have behaved themselves under Obama
Exactly. In the war over access to resources, between capital and labor, between the money renters and everyone else, it is the former party who's winning (don't believe me? compare their paychecks and trends), making life worse for millions, and since the guy who stands for labor (if he doesn't, don't call him "socialist") is losing, let's support a big moneylender making demonstrable lies, making statements in unguarded moments that prove his loyalties.Quote from AK Forty Seven:
What I first noticed about CO was that his biggest gripe was about wall street and how they fucked the US.Now he's fully supporting a former wall street guy who will let them run wild again
